which means QVC are in full LGBGTQYZ mode. Its not PC to say I object to this, but I am not in agreement to favour one section of the population over others for a whole month on a shopping channel. If there are people in this country who have no idea about this organisation then they've been living under a stone.
We've discussed this before on here, and aside from Breast Cancer month which was supported for many years and has now been abandoned, I cannot think of any other cause that gets so much attention. Every business and company in the UK no doubt has employees who identify as being other than heterosexual, so do they too make a big thing of it ?
QVC would get my respect far more if they nominated a new charity every month to promote. There are so many out there who would be ecstatic to get the publicity. Mine would be "Retired Greyhound Trust" and "Guide Dogs for the Blind".
Dropping the Breast Cancer charity really annoyed me. Especially as the NHS is paying thousands to change leaflets to 'chest' cancer and breastfeeding to 'chest' feeding at the insistence of Stonewall. You Guide Dog charity suggestion is great. How about QVC giving some of their profits from the Diamonique paw pendant to a dog charity?
I honestly don't get how sexuality got mixed up with lifestyle choices. Pride month brought gay people into the spotlight, helping normalise homosexuality, and making life easier for those who are same-sex attracted.
I have several LGB friends that say they are uncomfortable with the T+ being tagged along at the end but wouldn't dare say it to someone they didn't know well for fear of losing their jobs or being targeted with some pretty nasty online hate.
However, one of my gay friends has recently told me that the T+ was tacked on at the end by Stonewall in 2015. It was done because homosexuality had become accepted by most and gay marriage legalised so their funds were drying up.
They're now making money hand over fist by getting everyone from police forces to councils to schools and supermarkets to sign up for their inclusion training. He sent me a list of payments they'd had into their accounts annually and it's interesting to say the very least. The ONS, for example, pays £3k PA to be a member and in 2019/20 paid £810k for diversity training.
The Taxpayersalliance.com published a report last year saying that 327 publicly funded bodies paid over £3 million to Stonewall from 2019. The NHS alone gave them £466,065. The House of Commons paid over £22k in membership fees. You can check to see your local council or NHS Trust on Sex-matters.org. If you dig a little deeper you can find out how many thousands of pounds they spent to become one of their Champions.
WTAF?! And they don't even give correct legal advice. The EHRC early this year confirmed that female-only spaces are still a legal requirement and the only way a man should enter is if he holds a GRC. So, yes, you can legally challenge a bearded bloke in a skirt if he uses female-only spaces.
So, no, I won't be buying any of their rainbow tat for Pride month. And, yes, I do wish they'd support a charity that's a
good cause that really needs the money.