miss molly
Registered Shopper
I suppose their argument would be that you didn't bid anyway and the person who bought it did. If you had bid £1010 you would of got it.
I suppose their argument would be that you didn't bid anyway and the person who bought it did. If you had bid £1010 you would of got it.
They should have aired the bidding for that crown, because it was the main attraction.
it was shown in the morning show of that very same day and told it was a slient auction and you had to bid on the web or via the phone lines in that very show (all was said in the morning show)
it was shown in the morning show of that very same day and told it was a slient auction and you had to bid on the web or via the phone lines in that very show (all was said in the morning show)
As I've said before due to my personal circumstances I find it hard to watch the evenings and usually have a trip out with the v box set. This year we were at home and had the sound down as the items weren't on the web site till they were about to be shown. From what I saw the whole event didn't appear to be organised as well as other evenings.
The selection of auctions were poor in previous years, I recall a Dawn Bibby auction raising over 4,000 pounds and I think someone paid over 6,000 for Joe Mc to sing for them last year.
How much would an avid QVC fan pay to be guaranteed:
A yearly subscription to all the QVC events with the promise of goody bags?
A yearly subscription to be on the testing panel and get to keep the products?
An invite to a live show of their choice, with goody bags/transport/hotel, building tour/meet presenters and lunch?
A specialized session of their choice with ie. Beauty skin / makeup with Alison or Garden makeover with Richard or Crafting Session with Steph.
Neither of these would be much of an outlay for QVC since a lot go on anyway.
If the winning bid was £1000 then that's that. Whether a presenter bought it is neither here nor there as long as there was nothing underhand to ensure it did go to a presenter. And there is nothing to clarify whether it went to a presenter or not ... and there's nothing other than the presumed value of the thing to evaluate how much it would have actually gone for. If whoever bought it has asked for their name to be confidential then there is no way to find out. And if that's the case they are not going to confirm or deny that it's a presenter. They can't!
I understand your point of view Strato but I'm not sure QVC have done anything wrong here. Other than failed to get anything like the money they thought they would for the damned thing.
But if bidding was slow what was to stop them saying 'bidding's up to £800 now , keep bidding' etc and actually encouraging people to raise a far greater amount. From what I'm reading here it sounds as if it all went quiet for some strange reason.