The range probably isn't selling very well - not surprising with such a tacky name. It all boils down to money in the end.
Her mistake was getting to big for her sling-backs and falling out with QVC USA. She should have stuck with Models Prefer. :cheeky:
:wave2:That's a bit harsh! She's genuinely enthusiastic and I feel teaches the viewer a lot more than any of the other make up guests. The fact that she starts a show with no make up (and gets SOME presenters to do so to) impresses me as she shows how good her range actually is. I have bought more since she changed to YBF as the formulas are much improved!
That's a bit harsh! She's genuinely enthusiastic and I feel teaches the viewer a lot more than any of the other make up guests. The fact that she starts a show with no make up (and gets SOME presenters to do so to) impresses me as she shows how good her range actually is. I have bought more since she changed to YBF as the formulas are much improved!
i always watch if she is on because she is v entertaining, especially if there some nice chemistry with the other presenter. and the whole "transformation" concept is a clever one. I do think she has changed though, this new range looks dead tacky on-screen - the plastic pink cases and rip off of the YSL logo, no idea how she is getting away with THAT! the row she had with QVC US meant she had to give up the MP name and it seems to have burst the balloon somewhat. can you imagine building up a brand for all those years and then losing it in a legal wrangle? that must be devastating and just goes to show how powerful QVC must be that they can take that away from someone. its all very sad and i hope she pulls it back somehow... but i cant see her doing it with YBF.
So if she's no longer on QVC US how come she's still allowed on UK? Why was she not allowed to keep the name?
Despite the packaging (which personally, I don't mind), the new range is paraben free which is much better!