I can never understand why people think that one kind of cruelty matters and another kind doesn't. Anything which causes pain, distress, or suffering, to any living creature is abhorrent and should be deplored. I have never been able to get my head round the argument that human life is the only life that matters. If a natural disaster of epic proportions occurs, nature doesn't discriminate between one life form and another, they all perish. I'm sure that had the dinosaurs been capable of arrogance, they would have been the most supremely conceited creatures who ever lived for the 150-odd million years they dominated the earth. Don't see many of them around now though, do you? Well, unless you count Jeremy Clarkson and Jim Davidson and a few others. There have been waves of extinction throughout time, and, at some point, human life will become extinct too. I suppose my point is that surely the planet would be a better place to live if we showed even a basic respect to other life forms. I judge countries on how they treat their most vulnerable, and, for me, animals, unable to voice their suffering, will always be a part of that equation of vulnerability, along with, and not exclusive of, the most vulnerable human members of society. I saw for 40 years how my mentally ill brother was treated in a so-called 'civilised' society, and it was not edifying in any way. Suffering is universal and not limited to the dominant life form at the time, and it seems to me that it is somewhat limiting to just focus on one aspect of pain. Frankly, anything, or anyone, struggling and suffering pain and exploitation, is liable to put a crimp in my evening.