mummy bear
< My 3 Little Bears.
is it just me or does anyone else think this thread should now be closed ??
you have raised some good points there GD it is not the fact i think of people making negative comment about Rocks it is about the nasty way it is put i have had a few bits of bling from rocks that have been crap IMHO i have had a few cock ups with deliveries but Hey thats life their is no need for any nastiness which is what has been happening lately i dont know why ? but i still think Steve and anyone else has the right to reply lets face it owner or not there is only so much **** you can take before the red mist comes down .I dont know anything about posting in a fake names and have been to look and did not find any thing that worried me in those posts obviously it was known by the powers that be that this was Sarah so if it is unethical remove the posts.IAM NOT a rocks can do no wrong fan thats crap every one does wrong but i will stand up when i think someone ,anyone even Lee is being treated unfairly and i think that this relentless slagging off Steve,Sarah,Alan ,computers etc has gone on long enough.As you said this forum WAS about chat on jewellery helping someone who is having probs with things ,good information ,making friends and having a good banter with the odd winge about certain companies and helping put defininate NOnos with others right, but of late it has been used as punching bag to inflict as much pain as poss I dont know Lee or Graham or any of you personally but what i do know is this constant barrage of attacks is not doing any of us any good it is ruining the reason for this sight it is not a notice board to personally attack someone IT IS time this was stopped :mysmilie_687:Ok, well i agree with Graham on this one. Whilst i don't agree with all of Lee Jones comments (i actually rather like alan, enjoy watching him) he does have a right to his opinion on here. YES Steve has a right to reply, but to do so on a public forum is unprofessional in my opinion. I know there are alot of very loyal rocks fans on this forum, and thats great but i think its a bit unfair that whenever someone posts something not too flattering about rocks they get shouted down by certain members. Saying that, i do understand that people want to defend their opinion and what they like and enjoy, but perhaps we could agree to disagree a little more.
I do agree with Lee Jones on one point, why does Steve throw the word competitor around whenever someone puts a negative comment? surely its human nature that not everyone is going to love his channel, people are different and there for enjoy/like different things. Whilst some people will love the casual family run style of rocks, others may see it as abit unprofessional.
Finally to the most important thing said on this thread, why on earth is Sarah Bennett acting in such an unprofessional manner? Posting under a fake name is basically pathetic and childish IMO! Rocks are quick to band the word "competitor" about when anyone makes a negative comment making out its other channels slagging them off and giving the impression they are above that sort of behaviour when sarah is posting under a fake name! Totally out of order. I am sure she has sent a email to graham full of excuses ( have never seen or heard rocks take responsibility for any mistakes etc, always excuses) but there isn't really an excuse for this, and yes i am sure other channels have done it too, and that is also totally out of order. This forum is for chat about jewellery, making friends and having fun, not for silly jewellery sellers to play childish games - ok everyone, feel free to have a go at me now :mysmilie_11:
is it just me or does anyone else think this thread should now be closed ??
Why?
Because the sparkly image of Rocks TV is being shattered?
If it was closed, Steve wouldn't have the opportunity to reply, which wouldn't be very fair.
I think we would all agree that everyone has the right to voice their opinion in a calm and reasoned manner, but this thread has now developed into something completely different. If Sarah has been posting under an "alter-ego" she must realise that she was risking seriously damaging RocksTV's credibility and in my opinion this needs to be addressed.
Graham, Sarah gave you permission to post her email, will you now do so?
Thanks Graham for posting Sarahs reply ... very interesting!!
You have made an allegation about Sarah that she has denied, do you still stand by it?
I haven't read this thread for a few days but boy has it gone down hill faster than greasy s**t on a shinny shovel.
As with everyone in the public eye they have to take the rough with the smooth. I think it is brilliant that the Bennetts come on here and post to help us when there is a problem and I would like to think that will never change.
However, I think it is unprofessional for an MD to attack a forum member.
This is just one thread, others have been nothing but praise. In the world of business there is no nice, nice and since this is where rocks got most of its business when starting up, I think it is only fair that they should learn to take the good press with the bad.
RocksTV burst onto our TV screens in a burst of glory and gained many more loyal customers who where no doubt impressed with the apparent honesty & integrity of the company. This allegation makes me wonder if the honeymoon period is coming to an end?
Personally, if it is Sarah it doesn't make my pieces and less shiny, it doesn't add a couple of quid to what I paid for them and it doesn't detract from the service I have received, so it doesn't really bother me.
Cor .... I think I need to go and lie down in a darkend room , boy that was some read!!!!!!