I think that's always the way when there's a thread in support of a presenter - you'll always get more strident calls to her defence. Nobody, but nobody, will ever replace Deftly Bling in the category of Most Hated Presenter for me, but that's just my opinion. However I do think it's interesting how the public and private personas apparently differ - or do they? What you're seeing on screen is just another side to what you see in real life, so I think there's eg a more pushy side to DF than there is to CH, just as CH has a more ingratiating side to her than DF. It depends on what sort of an all-round person you're attracted to, imho.
That's your opinion and you are entitled to it, just like I am entitled to my opinion on CH. I don't have any problem with your opinion on Debbie Flint or any other presenter, what I object to is people saying we can't say what we like about CH but can about other presenters. That is the thing that bugs me. All the presenters are human, some people may think CH is "nice" I personally don't agree. I don't think being gushy and sugary makes someone "nice" and that is my opinion. It just irritates me when someone starts a topic about the poor treatment of CH, and says we should all be positive about her, yet then goes off and starts a negative thread on another presenter, be that Debbie, Jill, Craig etc whoever it doesn't really matter who.
I think Chloe is a nice woman, I personally don't get the hate but it would be very hypocritical of me to start a thread about the poor treatment she gets when I myself have slated many presenters. Why the double standard? hardly fair. I am sure I will be shot down in flames for voicing my unpopular opinion, but that is my opinion take it or leave it. People seem to ignore the good things I have said about CH, I haven't seen anyone on here say a bad word about her figure in in fact we all agree she has a good figure. But I don't think she should get a free pass about her presenting style just because she happens to be a favorite of some on here.