I wonder if there will be "consequences" for the brand in question?
I think - please correct me if I've got it wrong - we've had 3 fashion TSVs which have had to be replaced at short notice by beauty brands [Clarks, Liz Claibourne and now The Sak]. It's a shame when a glimpse of variety (even in the well-promoted fashion department) is squashed and steamrollered by the behemoth which is QVC beauty department. I'm a beauty junkie, but I like to learn about new things and not just in beauty. I know previous The Sak TSVs have been very well-received. They only do about 1 a year anyway, don't they? I wonder if the bag, when it does finally come into stock, will be on a price around the same as the TSV would have been?
I accept that there is probably more blame to be laid at the door of the brand than QVC - they negotiate well in advance, and specify quantities as well as price - so it's then down to the brand to ensure they're ready to roll on the day, which means ensuring they resolve any issues with their suppliers are resolved quickly.
Although... has the same bag by The Sak been a TSV or equivalent anywhere else? Maybe, if it was in the US, the superior bargaining power of QVCUS dipped into the stocks for QVCUK?
I have, in the past, heard presenters boast that they've taken stock which was allocated for other QVCs, so it's not impossible that another QVC took the stock which was destined for UK, is it?