No No TSV 10/08/14

[SUPERCOOLWILLOW]

no!no! 8800 Face & Body Complete Hair Removal System
Item Number: 400715
QVC Price £194.00
Today's Special Value Price £159.96
P&P: £6.95

http://www.qvcuk.com/no!no!-8800-Fa...t.400715.html?cm_sp=VIEWPOSITION-_-1-_-400715

 

[miss molly]

Theres no limits.......................to them trying to flog this device.

 

[Ellaaa]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[loveallthingsitalian]

One assumes that the TSVs which come back time and time again must sell, and have acceptable return levels, but you just wonder sometimes don't you judging by reviews and opinions on this forum. Shows what we know!

 

[paulawl]

I've been shopping with QVC for 14 years, and the no no! is one of the few items I have returned, so I'll be safe for this one!

 

[boffy]

NO NO not again!

 

[whitesnake]

NO NO!!! Not again!! How many times has this been a TSV now? The reviews on the website are rubbish. I can only think they bought loads of stock and still have a ton to shift. It'll be another switch off for me on Sunday I think. I am watching less and less QVC these days.

 

[Ellaaa]

There must be a big profit margin on it.

 

[JR's Ego]

NO NO? Thats right.. 'No' 'No'

Does it work? NO
Will you be hair free? NO

I simply cannot understand why QVC still push this product!

Why it sells:
This not only takes care of the problem of having hair now, but it also reduces the amount of hair you have going forward.This is what makes the product so inviting. It speaks to people on two different levels, promising not only to get rid of the current problem, but also making the problem lessen with each consecutive use
BUT:
Here are the facts..
IT DOES NOT WORK, simple.
At the launch of this device to the consumer, it literally had no competition of a similar type. The only alternative was to spend thousands of pounds at a laser clinic., which made the NoNo seem so tempting. However times have changed, and we now have far more 'at home' devices, that surpass this product. Products that also DONT require further purchases such as blades etc etc.

By all means if you just love wasting money, and enjoy the smell of roast pork, go ahead and buy a Jelly bean (oh wow) coloured NoNo because this is exactly the result you will get, and also have continued hair growth.

QVC could set a 190 day guarantee, and the product STILL will not deliver the 'hair free promise'

Why am I posting? I am annoyed that QVC continue to sell NoNo, When they did eventually do something right regarding hair removal, and launched TRIA, they selected the WORST IPL device. *rolled eyes* They must think customers are truly stupid.

There are amazing IPL devices out there, The NoNo TSV takes £160 of your hard earned cash, whereas IPL now costs the same, and I highly recommend IPL 'silk'n flash' (around same £) being my personal no1

If anyone posts that they are now completely hair free, hair that does not grow back after using No No, it will be a first for me to come across someone, therefore I apologise if my opinion might have offended, but the consensus is NoNo is best left alone

 

[cheesecake]

Don't be absurd. You can't state "here are the facts, it doesn't work". The reviews on the website and independant websites can show it works for some. IPL doesn't work for some people, but you would be quite aghast if someone came on here and said "here are the facts, IPL doesn't work".

 

[Vienna]

The NO No presentations always make me laugh. Throughout the whole presentation you have the 2 guests NO NO-ing away even whilst talkng and when they put the helpline number on screen and assured people that someone would be there all the time to answer queries, I envisaged rows of desks and phones, manned by men and women holding the phone in one hand and No No-ing their arms, legs, face etc with the other hand.

 

[MinxyKitten]

Cindy's before and after: before is back lit and face angled to highlight the fuzz. After is front lit and face angled not to see fuzz, ear in shot! The young girl they showed, also majorly different lighting and can't really see a difference.

Call me cynical...

 

[louise66]

We seem to be getting conflicting information here. I have epilepsy and, by virtue of previous claims by the guests regarding this system, I was always of the opinion that being epileptic, it was not suitable for me to use. This definitive question was asked, and the guest said it could be used by epileptics, as the thermicon waves did not affect it, or something. Of course they did advise to see your doctor. I wish they would get their facts right, as this could be dangerous if used by epileptics, and it shouldn't be. I cannot shave my legs, due to eczema, and saw this as a possible solution. As they have said more than once, as did the QVC website, that it was not for use by epilepsy sufferers, I think I will steer clear.

 

[Toril]

Cindy's before and after: before is back lit and face angled to highlight the fuzz. After is front lit and face angled not to see fuzz, ear in shot! The young girl they showed, also majorly different lighting and can't really see a difference.

Call me cynical...

I'll join you in being cynical because, on one of the before and after shots, it didn't look like the same woman (although I know that it probably was) because her nose looked a totally different shape in both shots.

And why on earth we have to put up with 4 whole hours (excluding the night time repeats) of the No No, heaven only knows. At least it's meant that I haven't bothered putting QVC on to watch today or maybe they're just trying to bore the viewers to death. (And with repetitive products like this one, I reckon they'll succeed.)

 

[loveallthingsitalian]

I own the no no (don't ask! ) and nothing will convince me that they are using an actual working machine. Unless you had facial hair problems who in their right mind would shave their face nilly willy all day long on a TV show. I would doubt that apart from legs the presenters and models would NEVER shave (and they say you should do this a few days prior to use) without it being a last resort, yet there they sit using it up the arms, up the face like there is no tomorrow.

Another case of being very very economical with the truth (I'm being very diplomatic here)

 

[Mazza]

That has always puzzled me LATI. I have seen this item on its own show a few times and the guest always seems to use it non stop on the same spot on her left arm. Can that be right? Is there such a thing as over exposure to a no no? Does this gadget actually work?

 

[louise66]

Maggie "I'm not a model, just a QVC customer", wearing her no no t shirt, was invited to the beauty bash, and was invited to come on air and talk about the machine. Obviously, they were aware of her opinion of the no no. Now, I am innately cynical and quite sceptical but, imo, this lovely lady wouldn't travel to London (if she doesn't already live there), on to the QVC studiod, for the good of her health, and at her own expense? Has she been 'persuaded' to appear throughout the day? Or could it just be that she is a 'star struck' celebrity hunter? - just joking!

 

[louise66]

I have, as requested, posted a question on fb, for Will to get the guest to answer, re the epilepsy concern. They replied to other questions on fb, but not mine. Um. Then told us to keep the questions coming in, cos it's great to be able to answer them for us. Right.