I wrote this recently:
Do you think Natalia is a shyster, or mad as a box of frogs, or genuinely believes all the stuff she spouts about these beauty products?
I watched a bit and she was talking about skin oxidisation, creams, put some on, said it was working on her neck within 5mins, had resurfaced her skin. As far as I can tell, it just made it a bit lighter because it was white cream.
A while back she read all the box/slide statistics as % of people, when it all referred to expected % improvement over 6 weeks, she read it as % of people who agreed, seemed to just speak randomly as if her 'beauty family' will listen and swallow any old guff.
The red and blue lasers, she seems to talk random scientific terms without knowing what they mean.
I don't think she has any science training and keeps talking about moisturising, sealing water in, electrical therapy, etc, etc.
I looked up some of these terms and the evidence for these affecting skin or blood cells was there but highly questionable; 'may' or 'requiring more research' according to reputable sources. Hyaluronic, oxygenation, cold laser, she bandies about all sorts of science terms and phrases, seemingly randomly?
It's all snake oil isn't it?
But does she know that, or just playing along to sell, or genuinely believes it and learns all the terms?
I know some skin creams can make skin a bit softer, temporarily, until you stop using but moisturising skin, our skin is a barrier to keep water and impurities out, like pruning in the bath.
A multi-billion beauty industry, is any of it real or effective. Even the before/after photos make me wonder.