In every walk of working life people are judged, appraised and indeed criticised for those individual aspects that impact on their ability to perform their job. No one is interested in a TV model's intellect, time-management skills etc; her sole raison d'etre is to look beautiful and enhance the product she's modeling surely? As a result, if a model's appearance is distracting from the product maybe that's a subject that's open to debate; whether it's her pouty lips, gurning face-pulling, peg-dolly hair or whatever?
What amazes me is how few TV models there seem to be! The same faces: Beulah, Tiffany, Jo (the older blonde over-acting one) etc appear on QVC, Lorraine and This Morning as though there are no other models available. Does their agency have a monopoly on 35+ modelling?Back to the perennial Q of forum critique of shopping channel personnel .... it's a forum about shopping telly!
*How many posts have you reported to the mods?
No one has challenged my assertion that Frankie's face is not symmetrical, which would be the logical counter-argument rather than implying that forum-members are less attractive-looking and this is their motivation for posting. Stick to facts not speculation I say.
Jude xx
*Rhetorical Q...that's between you and the mods