Ruth Langsford Fashion TSV 18/01/25

[candycane]

Ruth's probably not happy as the tank top has tanked. Less cash for her I'm guessing. It's far too much money for what it is. She did say there was an "athleisure" range coming - can hardly wait.

CC

 

[Brissles]

No one succeeds in wearing a blouse under a knit - they never lay properly and looks bulky and messy.
Same with wearing a knit under a dress - looks odd but still the "fashionistas" push the look.

 

[candycane]

Ruth said you could wear it over a nice floral dress. Well, yes you could if you wanted to look like a total bag lady. Don't forget to wear your brother's doc martens to complete the look and carry your Tesco reusable bag when you go for a night out.

CC

 

[Grizelda]

No one succeeds in wearing a blouse under a knit - they never lay properly and looks bulky and messy.
Same with wearing a knit under a dress - looks odd but still the "fashionistas" push the look.

It certainly did no favours to Jilly. It was all bunchy across her middle.

 

[donna255]

I wore a tank top in the 1970s as a young teen. They should be left there.

A blind man on a galloping horse could design better.

 

[Battiola73]

No one succeeds in wearing a blouse under a knit - they never lay properly and looks bulky and messy.
Same with wearing a knit under a dress - looks odd but still the "fashionistas" push the look.

I regularly wear cardigans over blouses but I certainly wouldn’t wear this monstrosity from RL over one.