Oh no, stop right there. I can now see why you have bad feelings for rocksandco. The only points I would disagree with you on are:
[1] Unwatchable presenters. I remember the "good old" days of John Scott, Ruth Linnett et al, were they unwatchable? I don't think so, I thought they were good fun, and seemed to know something (if not everything) about the jewels they were selling. I suspect what u actually mean is the current batch of presenters. JerriLee Bonner was a bit off her head in the old days, but I personally feel she has a better presenting style compared to how she used to be. My fave is Vicky B, she looks pretty, dresses in nice outfits and also seems to know a reasonable amount about gems. Only thing with Vicky is she does tend to go on a bit.
[2] 5 hours a days. Mmm, certainly think that this amount of time in a day is not going to make them a great deal of money, and cannot see any light at the end of the tunnel ie will they ever return to longer working hours. Don't know.
[3] Diniz et al. When I "first" saw Tony sat next to a presenter I thought it was quite a good idea for one person to bounce ideas / points with the other presenter, quite unique I think. But now looking at it since then I am not so amazed by the gem hunters from South America. They seem to like to give the big sell for any of their gems, and they also like amateur dramatics. It does not look good when T Diniz drops his head in his hands when a price drops below what he had expected. All seemed rather staged if you ask me.
[4] Would love it if they had more variety in their jewelery - they seem to only do rings and pendants, and a very occasional bracelet. And they dont seem to use silver at all.
After all that you might think I am not so much of a number 1 fan of rocksandco as I used to be, and you would be right. Even so, I would like to think (rather in hope than in reality) that rocksandco will get better, who knows.