Lulu - now she's doing jewellery.

[lynnonthelake]

Yes SCW is a star.xxxxxx
Lynn

 

[minim]

Fair play, our Lu has agreed to be photographed without make-up (eyes ?) for raise money for Children In Need.

Lulu said: ‘Today, beauty comes in all shapes, sizes and ages, so I am proud to dare to bare to help raise money for the amazing BBC Children in Need’s BearFaced Day campaign.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...l-look-winner-shed-make-Children-In-Need.html

 

[Frazzled]

Good on her, but professionally photographed with right background, lighting, hair and some make-up. She has barely a wrinkle which looks down to more than her products!

I'm betting she's been airbrushed with Mineral Veil? - she's braver than me though!

 

[reflexgirl]

Anyone know what LKC stands for ?

 

[boffy]

i am looking forward to how lulu will justify the cost of the jewellery

 

[Capirossi]

Anyone know what LKC stands for ?

Lulu Kennedy Cairnes? Which bears no resemblance to her real name of Marie McDonald McLaughlin Lawrie

Pretentious much?!

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[LE lover]

I thought it was Lulu's Kitsch. Crap

 

[Tinkerbelle]

I am not buying it but I really like the moon pendant. If anyone sees something similar let me know. I am not buying it. I am not!!

 

[rainbowdottie]

I saw JR on a yankee show and she had on THE most FAB-U-LOUS earrings.I thought they were diamonique hoops.I waited all show for her to say thinking I can't be the only ones totally in love.She didn't mention them so I phoned CS.I was told 6pm 28th Nov.

Looked at the TV guide and its spanx...I thought eh?! but diamonique is before spanx...so hoping and preparing myself to remember the show.

I saw them earrings again on JR on the repeat TSV showing this morning.Its dawned on me they look like one of lulu's in SCW's link on the previous page.Its dawned on me that Lulu is on tonight at 6pm.Its dawned on me that maybe CS meant tonight at 6pm.Its dawned on me that yes I think thats them....and they're £80!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No matter how much I love them,£80 is one shed load of money for LuLu earrings.I love links of london.Ok what can you buy there for £80.....but for not much more you'll a nicer piece of jewellery.

Oh and cheers CS for getting wrong....imagine if I really did want them for me/as a present and you've got me sat watching the wrong show!

 

[Vienna]

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0085WYML8/?tag=shoppingcom03-21
Not identical but sterling silver and only £39

 

[Rabbit]

Can't believe the prices for these things, they look cheap, like the sort of thing you'd pick up for a couple of quid on a market stall.

Sandra xx

 

[rainbowdottie]

I think these are the said earrings that JR was wearing
http://www.qvcuk.com/LKC-By-Lulu-In...ER-_-2&relType=INTELLIGENTOFFER&refLocation=2 and I now note further that for 80 squids they're not even silver :mysmilie_466:

 

[SUPERCOOLWILLOW]

they wont be silver as its in the fashion jewellery number

 

[rainbowdottie]

Yes quite high prices then lululums!

 

[LE lover]

Is looks so cheap and tacky on screen.

 

[SparklyBarbs]

Apparently Kelly Hoppen was texting her earlier to see when the items would be
on cause she was wanting to buy presents for Christmas :tongue:

 

[SparklyBarbs]

Lulu must be aiming the jewellery at us desperate 50 to 60 years old, cause she thinks we're stuck in
a rut, and if i hear "ROCK THE HOUSE" one more time, i will scream and S H O U T

 

[reflexgirl]

Well, I'm going to rock the house here and say I dont think it is THAT bad. I didnt hate it! (except the armadillo ring - reminds me of a woodlouse and I'm not good with woodlice!) Quite liked the cuff bracelets actually BUT, that said, I think it was just too pricey - more than bibi bijoux (which I also like). I will watch with interest what the reviews say!

 

[louise66]

DF has just mentioned that old hamster cheeks is bringing out a jewellery range at the end of the month. Why, why, why? Do we not suffer enough with Timebomb?

I can completely comprehend that analogy - I think it is quite applicable!

 

[louise66]

It does appear to be taken for granted that, whatever area a celebrity takes a foray into, it will be a success. Why should it? Just because someone is a household name, does not mean that they are specialists in any given field. Lulu - as we are discussing her although other celebrities are doing the same - is a singer/actress; what does she know about skincare? She has admitted to having botox - certainly not a glowing endorsement for her range. One would question why her skin looks the way it does, her skincare routine, or the procedure? I would tend to go with the latter. Regarding her jewellery line - I cannot comment on the appearance/quality of the line as I didn't watch the hour - it is a money spinner for her. Whatever she/QVC says, in all probability, she has designers who have the experience required to develop the jewellery. Same with Andrea McClean; what does she know about designing jewellery? It's a nice little earner for her. QVC also seem to see Diamonique as a financially successful range when they have designer/celebrity ranges on board. Obviously, some people are entirely consumed by wearing jewellery which has been 'designed' (poetic licence) by celebrities. The Q are, quite rightly from a business point of view, cashing in on this.