L’Occitane TSV 20/11/22

[Sazza]

But the description says three handcreams! Unless I am going blind, no offence meant btw

Q have not put up a description yet, I am going by the photos.

 

[SUPERCOOLWILLOW]

You do not know what percentage of Q's sales are. Stop making unsubstantiated comments.

LOOOOL I DO!! but im not telling you

L’Occitane 6 Piece Collection TSV 20/11/22 (Pre sale from 16th)

L'Occitane 6 Piece Luxury Festive Gift Collection - QVC UK

L'Occitane 6 Piece Luxury Festive Gift Collection order online at QVCUK.com

www.qvcuk.com

Floral
500ml Neroli & ? Hand & Body Liquid Soap RRP £22 + post
500ml Cherry Blossom Shower Gel RRP £30 + post
150ml Hibiscus Hand Cream RRP £32 + post
100g Milk Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml Hand Cream RRP £6 + post
30ml Cherry Blossom Hand Cream RRP £6 + post

Total RRP £106

Verbena

500ml TBC
500ml Verbena Shower Gel RRP £30 + post
150ml Hand Balm RRP £25 + post
100g Verbena Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml TBC Hand Cream RRP £8 + post
30ml Verbena Hand Cream RRP £8 + post

Total RRP £77 + post so far

Warm

500ml Vanilla Bouquet Hand & Body Liquid Soap RRP £22 + post
500ml Amber Vanilla Shower Creme RRP £33 + post
150ml Amber Vanilla Hand Cream RRP £32 + post
100g Almond Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml Hand Cream RRP £8 + post
30ml Almond Hand Cream RRP £8 + post

Total RRP £109 + post

the 30ml hand cream is acutally a Foot Cream

 

[Sazza]

LOOOOL I DO!! but im not telling you

the 30ml hand cream is acutally a Foot Cream

How rude!
You cannot make unsubstantiated statements, you have been told this time and time again. Either give the details to back it up or don't say anything, unless you want the forum to get into legal trouble.

 

[Sazza]

L’Occitane 6 Piece Collection TSV 20/11/22 (Pre sale from 16th)

L'Occitane 6 Piece Luxury Festive Gift Collection - QVC UK

L'Occitane 6 Piece Luxury Festive Gift Collection order online at QVCUK.com

www.qvcuk.com

Floral
500ml Neroli & ? Hand & Body Liquid Soap RRP £22 + post
500ml Cherry Blossom Shower Gel RRP £30 + post
150ml Hibiscus Hand Cream RRP £32 + post
100g Milk Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml Hand Cream RRP £6 + post
30ml Cherry Blossom Hand Cream RRP £6 + post

Total RRP £106

Verbena

500ml TBC
500ml Verbena Shower Gel RRP £30 + post
150ml Hand Balm RRP £25 + post
100g Verbena Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml TBC Hand Cream RRP £8 + post
30ml Verbena Hand Cream RRP £8 + post

Total RRP £77 + post so far

Warm

500ml Vanilla Bouquet Hand & Body Liquid Soap RRP £22 + post
500ml Amber Vanilla Shower Creme RRP £33 + post
150ml Amber Vanilla Hand Cream RRP £32 + post
100g Almond Soap RRP £6 + post
30ml Hand Cream RRP £8 + post
30ml Almond Hand Cream RRP £8 + post

Total RRP £109 + post

TSV goes on pre sale on 16th.

Value is £110

In the Floral option it is not original cherry blossom shower gel, it is the Cherry Blossom Etoile and the liquid soap is Neroli Orchid

In the Fresh option it is the Rosemary liquid soap.

 

[SisterBliss]

How rude!
You cannot make unsubstantiated statements, you have been told this time and time again. Either give the details to back it up or don't say anything, unless you want the forum to get into legal trouble.

What is the legal trouble please?

 

[Sazza]

What is the legal trouble please?

We cannot have forum members making statements that look like information is coming from QVC when it has not.

So for example tomorrow during the big Elemis TSV presenters will regularly be stating on air how many thousands of the TSV have sold, so members posting that on here is fine as it has been made public. However what was stated earlier in this thread regarding body lotions/creams and percentage of sales is not allowed unless details as to where this information came from is provided.

Members can give an opinion but they cannot state things as fact without backing it up. So a member could say, "in my opinion TSVs with body lotion in them don't seem to sell as well as other TSVs" but saying "they are the lowest percentage of sales & actually always hurt sales when they are included in sets" is not acceptable.

If we don't tread this fine line we leave ourselves open to legal action.

 

[SisterBliss]

We cannot have forum members making statements that look like information is coming from QVC when it has not.

So for example tomorrow during the big Elemis TSV presenters will regularly be stating on air how many thousands of the TSV have sold, so members posting that on here is fine as it has been made public. However what was stated earlier in this thread regarding body lotions/creams and percentage of sales is not allowed unless details as to where this information came from is provided.

Members can give an opinion but they cannot state things as fact without backing it up. So a member could say, "in my opinion TSVs with body lotion in them don't seem to sell as well as other TSVs" but saying "they are the lowest percentage of sales & actually always hurt sales when they are included in sets" is not acceptable.

If we don't tread this fine line we leave ourselves open to legal action.

What sort of legal action do we leave ourselves open to, please?

 

[candycane]

One's that end up in court?

CC

 

[SisterBliss]

One's that end up in court?

CC

Don't be naughty Candy. You are playing up.
I predict you will now do a pretend huff to wind me up.

 

[miss molly]

The only people who know about Q's sale and percentages are the people who work for Q.
I know lots of people who love body creams but I don't.
The only thing I am worrying about today is if the Elemis TSV does not sell out and the girls have to climb into their lorries and come and get the remaining stock.

 

[SisterBliss]

The only people who know about Q's sale and percentages are the people who work for Q.
I know lots of people who love body creams but I don't.
The only thing I am worrying about today is if the Elemis TSV does not sell out and the girls have to climb into their lorries and come and get the remaining stock.

How do we know that SCW doesn't ? (Work for Q?) Or he may well have friends that do or who are hackers. Unless we are mind readers/set up a hideout in his home, we cannot possibly know the contents of his mind, which includes things about QVC.

 

[donna255]

How do we know that SCW doesn't ? (Work for Q?) Or he may well have friends that do or who are hackers. Unless we are mind readers/set up a hideout in his home, we cannot possibly know the contents of his mind, which includes things about QVC.

Well, the reason QVC banned him from posting on their Facebook page was because he was answering questions on their behalf. People asking do you work for QVC? He replied no! QVC got bored and banned him from the page.

As for the second part of your statement, I won't even answer. It is so stupid! If hackers got into QVC they will want customer details not what is the biggest sellers are.

 

[SisterBliss]

Well, the reason QVC banned him from posting on their Facebook page was because he was answering questions on their behalf. People asking do you work for QVC? He replied no! QVC got bored and banned him from the page.

As for the second part of your statement, I won't even answer. It is so stupid! If hackers got into QVC they will want customer details not what is the biggest sellers are.

Being 'banned' from a face book site is hardly a 'punishment'. People get banned from such sites frequently (often for not towing the (popularist) line) - see also the BTY facebook group.

I deliberately used exaggerated instances in the 'second part' to demonstrate the stupidity of the rhetoric. Looks like it worked.

 

[Sazza]

How do we know that SCW doesn't ? (Work for Q?) Or he may well have friends that do or who are hackers. Unless we are mind readers/set up a hideout in his home, we cannot possibly know the contents of his mind, which includes things about QVC.

Being 'banned' from a face book site is hardly a 'punishment'. People get banned from such sites frequently (often for not towing the (popularist) line) - see also the BTY facebook group.

I deliberately used exaggerated instances in the 'second part' to demonstrate the stupidity of the rhetoric. Looks like it worked.

We know that SCW does not work for QVC.

As for SCW or anyone on here knowing people who can hack why do you think we ask people state how they know things about Q? As I said before we cannot allow unsubstantiated comments that imply the information has come from QVC.

You cannot compare QVC's FB page and the BTY group on FB, the later is not an official Q group.

I suggest you drop this now as it has been clearly explained why we don't allow unsubstantiated statements.

 

[Koala]

Bought the one from last Christmas, giving this a miss.

 

[Letz-be-avenue]

I must admit am interested but will await price, I presume £50 ish?

 

[miss molly]

Well, the reason QVC banned him from posting on their Facebook page was because he was answering questions on their behalf. People asking do you work for QVC? He replied no! QVC got bored and banned him from the page.

As for the second part of your statement, I won't even answer. It is so stupid! If hackers got into QVC they will want customer details not what is the biggest sellers are.

Maybe somebody could hack in and and get our bliddy refunds processed faster

 

[SisterBliss]

We know that SCW does not work for QVC.

As for SCW or anyone on here knowing people who can hack why do you think we ask people state how they know things about Q? As I said before we cannot allow unsubstantiated comments that imply the information has come from QVC.

You cannot compare QVC's FB page and the BTY group on FB, the later is not an official Q group.

I suggest you drop this now as it has been clearly explained why we don't allow unsubstantiated statements.

We know that SCW does not work for QVC.

As for SCW or anyone on here knowing people who can hack why do you think we ask people state how they know things about Q? As I said before we cannot allow unsubstantiated comments that imply the information has come from QVC.

You cannot compare QVC's FB page and the BTY group on FB, the later is not an official Q group.

I suggest you drop this now as it has been clearly explained why we don't allow unsubstantiated statements.

why do you think we ask people (to) state how they know things about Q?<<

>>Yet it appears that you frequently select only SCW's posts for validation.........

I think I've made the point now & so choose to ease the posting of my thoughts on the matter.

 

[Sazza]

why do you think we ask people (to) state how they know things about Q?<<

>>Yet it appears that you frequently select only SCW's posts for validation.........

I think I've made the point now & so choose to ease the posting of my thoughts on the matter.

That is because he is only member who is in the habit of making comments which imply information has come from Q when it hasn't.

 

[Vienna]

La La Land is a wonderful place to inhabit. In my La La Land I`m boss to Alan Sugar and can tell him he`s fired, other peoples La La Land might include pretending to be a secret QVC mole and in charge of their stock control or someone else trying to be a wind up merchant on a shopping forum.
Now it`s back to reality for me, I`m bored with thoughts of Alan Sugar ......