shopperholic
Registered Shopper
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 10,425
Like most charities we relied heavily on donations around Christmas time. Our funding covered basic meals and room but there was nothing in the pot to make Christmas extra special. I was proud of my boss for refusing the offer and being a Christian charity he saw the £1000 offer from the boxer as being no more charitable than the number of Mr and Mrs Normals who came in off the street donating boxes of crackers or tins of biscuits or the Primary school who collected bars of soap and other toiletries so we could give each man a comfort pack or the local supermarket who emptied their shelves last minute Christmas Eve and donated turkeys, joints of meat or Argos who dropped off half a dozen Christmas tree or the Round Table and Rotary club who donated brand new gloves, socks, scarves for us to wrap and so on and so on and not one of them asked for recognition or to be named, only the boxer did that and his offer wasn`t a charitable act, it was an act of self promotion.
Yes I agree were you're coming from, sometimes a named sleb can actually do the charity more harm than good because it detracts from the charity itself and the work they do, once the hubbub of the sleb dies down, what are the charity left with? So yes that £1000 may have lost them more in the long run as they were buying publicly with that £1000 or it would've been given anonymously.