I still don't understand why people feel the need to make nasty comments about the presenters' appearances. They're only doing their job. If you think expensive skincare is a con and nivea or whatever is just as good, fair enough, but rather than sitting behind your computer writing about how hanging you think Fiona and Tanya etc look, how about you post photos of yourself and we can all judge the results.
I wasn't going to bother replying to your first post as you just came up with some unsubstantiated accusations of my post being nasty to the presenters (I prefer to class it as straight talk, thank you very much).
But since you are so persistent, let's give you the satisfaction: my objection is to their selling spiel which is based on - "listen here QVC audience, I am an expert, know what I am talking about; you
must do such and such or else you are in trouble, your skin and looks will suffer" selling propaganda.
It's a big fat lie and a con. If you are happy with their brainwashing propaganda designed to fleece the unsuspecting viewer off their hard earned cash, by creating insecurities, then fair do's, you keep watching and buying yourself.
There is nothing "nasty" in my opening post. I object precisely to the above and reserve the right to air my view on this forum or anywhere else for that matter. If that upsets someone's equilibrium, then I suggest they need to set their sensitivity threshold levels up a notch, or else please "don't come out to play".
As a rule, I refrain judging people based on their looks just for the sake of it. However, what others have commented on the fact that if the "skin-care-pushing-experts-and-presenters: we all use it too, brigade" are sporting faces that are evidently contradicting their own claims and hard sell propaganda, then I personally can't object to that evidence.
