I love the idea of yong kim.Its right up my street.I just can't get my head round the prices.I did buy piece maybe a year ago,on easy pay,but I didn't like it enough to keep.I don't think it did much for me and again,just couldn't get my head round the price.
If a TSV were to come though,I'd probably buy it.
as for Ingrid,I think shes harmless enough.....a bit potty...but I have no probs with that.I did look at her this morning and giggle to myself that I wouldn't go out the house even with my hair like that...but its very Ingrid isn't it?!
I think it's good that the range is on Q. It's totally different to anything else they sell and undeniably more contemporary -which (even if not to your taste) is what everyone has been asking for. No?
The problem is tokenism. Anyone saying to QVC that their fashion is outdated, stretchy tat targeted at lowest common denominator customers would hear the reply "oh no,we sell Yong Kim....haven't you seen it?"
Ok Q, your output is 97% LCD tat and Yong Kim is a shining beacon of something that represents the 21st century amongst the dross. This does not mean your fashion department can sit back on their kitten heels and gloat.
Three words: Must. Try. Harder.
And I would LOVE to see a photo of Q's fashion buying team.
I think it is over priced tatty and unflattering and bag lady describes it perfectly. IMO.......
Ingrid looks a mess but I think some of the pieces look quite nice. It is not cheap, but it does look well made. Personally, I would rather invest in a few good items rather than a load of cheap tat. Always amazed when I see people laden down with Primark carrier bags full to bursting point with stuff that will probably fall apart after a couple of outings.
i'm one of those people and never had anything from primark fall apart. m&s yes, primark, no. it's the same as everywhere else, just without the ridiculous mark-up.