backstreetgirl
Registered Shopper
I tuned in at 9pm as I wanted to see the Estee Lauder deals. They showed the fragrance set and Flinty went overboard saying how much you save and of course with the no p & p too (it was £74.98). I was wondering whether to try it, when it suddenly went limited. Arggh I thought, I'd better pick up that phone quickly, so I ordered it. Seconds after I ordered, it sold out, phew I thought. Today I've gone to QVC's website and it's in stock! Ok it's now gone up in price to £89, but I thought it had sold out! I do realise though that maybe some have 'dropped out' of people's baskets, as they love to say.
Anyhow, I've just done a search and discovered the set on Boots website, for £74! So much for Flinty saying 'if you go to Estee Lauder direct it will cost £xx pounds more.' Obviously no mention that you can buy it for a few pence cheaper at Boots. (Which I admit is not like Boots as I find them quite expensive since covid).
I'm thinking though, that if I don't like it at least I can send it back within 60 days, which of course I couldn't do with Boots.
But it has made me think that I really need to do searches when things come to air that I'm interested in and not take the presenters spiel at face value especially when it comes to prices elsewhere. They wouldn't tell porkies though, would they?
Anyhow, I've just done a search and discovered the set on Boots website, for £74! So much for Flinty saying 'if you go to Estee Lauder direct it will cost £xx pounds more.' Obviously no mention that you can buy it for a few pence cheaper at Boots. (Which I admit is not like Boots as I find them quite expensive since covid).
I'm thinking though, that if I don't like it at least I can send it back within 60 days, which of course I couldn't do with Boots.
But it has made me think that I really need to do searches when things come to air that I'm interested in and not take the presenters spiel at face value especially when it comes to prices elsewhere. They wouldn't tell porkies though, would they?
Last edited: