Dr Perricone MD has a range of beauty products that are sold on QVC.
The presenters rave about them (yes, you Jill Franks).
Over 60 products in the range are classed as "Cosmeceuticals". Not all of these are sold on QVC.
Maybe, QVC is going to have to look at how they market this beauty line.
In fairness, it is not just Dr Perricone who makes wild claims
What will Alison SAY?
I wait with baited breath
The presenters rave about them (yes, you Jill Franks).
Over 60 products in the range are classed as "Cosmeceuticals". Not all of these are sold on QVC.
http://www.insidecosmeceuticals.com...ceutical-an-overview-of-fda-s-regulation.aspxThe term cosmeceutical may be assumed by many to refer to a cosmetic product that does more than perform the purely cosmetic functions of cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness or temporarily altering the appearance. It is, after all, a portmanteau of the words “cosmetic" and “pharmaceutical." However, it is crucial for manufacturers, importers and distributors of products being marketed as cosmeceuticals in the United States to understand FDA’s very clear position on the term cosmeceuticals—namely, that this word has no meaning under the law, and that any product that purports to do more than function solely as a cosmetic is actually a drug and will be regulated as such.
Maybe, QVC is going to have to look at how they market this beauty line.
In fairness, it is not just Dr Perricone who makes wild claims
The following are examples of regulatory action taken by FDA against companies marketing products as cosmetics, which FDA found to actually be illegal drug products under the law due to the claims being made:
Warning Letter issued April 18, 2011, against the manufacturer of an eyelash and eyebrow serum product, citing several drug claims, including: “designed to lengthen and thicken lashes in 30 days"; “induced a significant increase in the length of eyelashes"; “helps accelerate the length of the hair shaft, while promoting fuller, thicker, and healthier looking brows"; and “effectively renews and regenerates skin cells."5
Warning Letter issued March 1, 2011, against the marketer of a wrinkle serum product, citing several drug claims, including: “reduce expression lines & deep furrows"; “decrease wrinkle volume [and] density"; and “increase skin firmness."6
Warning Letter issued March 29, 2007, against the marketer of a topical skin product, citing several drug claims, including: “good for reestablishing new collagen growth … helps keep the skin from sagging"; “protects skin against harm caused by exposure to sunlight"; “helps skin to produce new skin cells and rejuvenate damaged cells"; and “a strong weapon against thinning … slow growing and depleted hair."7
What will Alison SAY?
I wait with baited breath