She might be OK. I'm sure she can't be any worse than awful Boris Johnson. Sadiq Khan is not my cup of tea either. I quite liked Ken, although his bendy buses were terrible.
I don't know why, but whenever a woman candidate comes up for a political role, more often than not they mention they are championing women's causes in some way or other. Is this necessary in 2018? I wonder why they feel the need to do this. I'm sure if a man were to say he's going to stand up for men's issues, it wouldn't go down terribly well at all. I'm not saying that women should not champion women's issues if they feel they want to, and I know that historically women have been under-represented in many areas, it just seems questionable.
I interviewed all the candidates in the last race and noticed that pretty much each candidate seemed to be going for a segment of society and targeting the vote from that demographic. Sadiq Khan spoke about supporting Muslims in London. I asked him why this should matter, given that most people in London are not Muslim, and what he was going to do about other issues. It didn't go down terribly well, but I will always ask the questions I feel are worth asking and if something jumps out at me like that I will ask about it.