The dress I bought a good few years ago fitted everywhere except it was too small across the bust.nothing about this persuaded me to buy. I wonder, however, how many were sold. I must confess right across Kim's range her sizing astounds me, so I think most designers' sizing varies. I find her 2xl and 3xl sizing much smaller in the chest than most other brands.
Yes I find this too. For busty reasons I need a size 22 sometimes a 24 but the sizes don't seem to me at least to correlate with our sizing, mind you it is not just with Kim to be fair.The dress I bought a good few years ago fitted everywhere except it was too small across the bust.
Her employees apparently try on all the sizes, so I wonder if Canadian women are just different shapes to us. I just find her sizing skimpy so I haven't bought anything of hers for a long time.Yes I find this too. For busty reasons I need a size 22 sometimes a 24 but the sizes don't seem to me at least to correlate with our sizing, mind you it is not just with Kim to be fair.
Kim's clothing is definitely on the skimpy side and Nina Leonard's is often too big.Her employees apparently try on all the sizes, so I wonder if Canadian women are just different shapes to us. I just find her sizing skimpy so I haven't bought anything of hers for a long time.
I have looked for comparable clothes to Kim & Co online and high street but am always disappointed. They usually are cut differently around shoulders, arms, skimpier with material or do not contain elastane or need ironing.My local M&S has virtually the same dress in petite and regular for £17 and £19!
I agree with you, and yes I think these sizes are based on Canadian sizing.Her employees apparently try on all the sizes, so I wonder if Canadian women are just different shapes to us. I just find her sizing skimpy so I haven't bought anything of hers for a long time.