Ruth Langsford TSV 28/02/25

ShoppingTelly

Help Support ShoppingTelly:

Ruth Langsford Twill Utility Jacket
Item Number: 414043
QVC Price £60.00
Todays Special Value Price £45.00
P&P £3.95

Add a timeless touch to your outerwear collection with this utility twill jacket from Ruth Langsford. A perfect balance of comfort and style, it's made from a soft and stretchy cotton mix fabric and features snap button fastenings, a classic collar neckline and front patch pockets. This easy-to-style wardrobe staple will definitely become your go-to jacket throughout the seasons.

Comfort meets style - this jacket blends comfort with fashion, featuring a cotton-elastane bi-stretch fabric that moves in every direction for the perfect fit. Enhanced with classic utility-style details, including buttons and patch pockets, it’s a great addition to your wardrobe.

How to style - whether you're heading to the office or going out for lunch, this jacket will always be a good choice! For an effortlessly chic ensemble, layer it over a T-shirt and pair it with jeans and heeled boots, or dress it down with joggers and trainers for a stylish off-duty look.

What's your colour? With five gorgeous shades to choose from, simply pick one (or more!) that best complements your style. Choose Black for a versatile hue that pairs with everything or go for Stone or Grey for a minimal yet timeless addition to your wardrobe. Want to add some colour to your outfit? Opt for Navy or Khaki.



  • Long sleeves
  • Collared neckline
  • 95% cotton, 5% elastane
  • Machine wash cold


Colour options:

  • Black
  • Navy
  • Khaki
  • Stone
  • Grey


Garment measurements:

  • Chest: 8: 101.6cm (40"), 10: 104.1cm (41"), 12: 106.7cm (42"), 14: 109.2cm (43"), 16: 113cm (44.5"), 18: 116.8cm (46"), 20: 120.7cm (47.5"), 22: 125.7cm (49.5")
  • Waist: 8: 94.6cm (37.3"), 10: 97.2cm (38.3"), 12: 99.7cm (39.3"), 14: 102.2cm (40.3"), 16: 106.1cm (41.8"), 18: 109.9cm (43.3"), 20: 114.3cm (45"), 22: 118.8cm (46.8")
  • Length: 8: 71.5cm (28.1"), 10: 71.8cm (28.3"), 12: 72.1cm (28.4"), 14: 72.6cm (28.6"), 16: 73cm (28.8"), 18: 73.7cm (29"), 20: 74.3cm (29.3"), 22: 75.1cm (29.6")

http://www.qvcuk.com/qvc.product.414043.html
 
They all seem to be wearing a size too small? It is the sort of garment that wouldn’t be worn fastened but needs to look as though it would.Is it because we are used to so many oversized looks? This in the usual tradition of Ruth’s offerings seems dated like something you discovered in the back of the wardrobe from years ago.Sorry if you like it & find it a useful addition to your wardrobe but I like to see a bit of style and design flair. Perhaps in my late 70’s I have been around to see it all before!? That goes beyond Ruth’s ‘with a twist’ aka bit of orange piping.
 
It is ridiculous to have all participants in the show unable to plausibly wear the jacket done up. But looking at the fit across the shoulders it's the right size. Clearly designed for women with zero boo-bage!
Aside from that, Ruth does not suit the way she is wearing her jeans, imo. It has drastically shortened the look of her legs.
 
They all seem to be wearing a size too small? It is the sort of garment that wouldn’t be worn fastened but needs to look as though it would.Is it because we are used to so many oversized looks? This in the usual tradition of Ruth’s offerings seems dated like something you discovered in the back of the wardrobe from years ago.Sorry if you like it & find it a useful addition to your wardrobe but I like to see a bit of style and design flair. Perhaps in my late 70’s I have been around to see it all before!? That goes beyond Ruth’s ‘with a twist’ aka bit of orange piping.
The jacket looked on the small side. Both RL and Jilly wore Size 16, but didn't fasten it. If they had, it would have stretched to its limit around Ruth's bust and forget about Jilly managing to do it up around her hips. The sand/beige coloured one reminded me of the kind of coat a warehouse man would wear. Maybe that was the idea - utility jacket.
 
It is ridiculous to have all participants in the show unable to plausibly wear the jacket done up. But looking at the fit across the shoulders it's the right size. Clearly designed for women with zero boo-bage!
Aside from that, Ruth does not suit the way she is wearing her jeans, imo. It has drastically shortened the look of her legs.
I watched some of the show and noticed she was selling a lot of jackets. How many jackets does the average woman own, I wonder. And where do they hang them, given that most houses/flats have limited cupboard space. Maybe women buy a jacket and get rid of a jacket to make space for the new one. It's so easy to get an accumulation of clothes that you halfway like and keep, but rarely wear. A brutal turnout is the answer, imo.
 
Gawd, just watched a few minutes of the TSV presentation. I swear Ruth Langsford thinks she's Yves Saint Laurent or someone his equal!! I this, I that. Honestly Ruth, enough! As everyone has already said, what's the point in a garment that doesn't fasten? I also would call it more of an overshirt than a jacket. And what's with "cold wash"? I've never washed anything on a cold wash, ever. I'm out.
 
The jacket looked on the small side. Both RL and Jilly wore Size 16, but didn't fasten it. If they had, it would have stretched to its limit around Ruth's bust and forget about Jilly managing to do it up around her hips. The sand/beige coloured one reminded me of the kind of coat a warehouse man would wear. Maybe that was the idea - utility jacket.
Back in the day many men wore such jackets for work. We had very few clothes and possessions when I was a child and the day came when one of my sisters had to be kitted out to play a rat in a school play. The only thing my parents could provide for her costume was one of my dad's work jackets - the only rat in the universe branded with an "Esso" company logo.
Still mortified, 60 years later.
 
Back in the day many men wore such jackets for work. We had very few clothes and possessions when I was a child and the day came when one of my sisters had to be kitted out to play a rat in a school play. The only thing my parents could provide for her costume was one of my dad's work jackets - the only rat in the universe branded with an "Esso" company logo.
Still mortified, 60 years later.
Dear little rat. I can picture her.
 
I watched some of the show and noticed she was selling a lot of jackets. How many jackets does the average woman own, I wonder. And where do they hang them, given that most houses/flats have limited cupboard space. Maybe women buy a jacket and get rid of a jacket to make space for the new one. It's so easy to get an accumulation of clothes that you halfway like and keep, but rarely wear. A brutal turnout is the answer, imo.
Well, if you’re my little sister, too many is never enough….and you pay to keep them in storage and rotate them regularly. Madness, I know.
But, fair do’s, she always looks good.
 
I would never buy a jacket that didn't fasten. I have never liked any of Ruth's stuff. The prices are ridiculous, seen better and cheaper at George at Asda.
Same here. As I always say they’ve never waited on a cold railway station or a draughty exposed bus stop.

I don’t possess a jacket unless you count my two thick fleeces and my padded coat as jackets. Always use cardigans n stead of jackets in the cooler months.

Had a manager once that wanted us to wear uniforms including a skirt and jacket (we worked in an office with no face to face contact with customers). None of us wanted this. The outfitters came down from the supplier with samples to try on. Two of us out of the 20 in the office were extra large. Well the largest standard size skirt they had might had fitted one of my thighs and when I tried the jacket, it split. My colleague had a 42G bust and the jacket had no chance.

The supplier offered to tailor make suits to fit us but it would have cost over £1500 each for two jackets, two skirts and five shirts. The total cost for the office would have been around £11k. Never did get approved and the manager was let go a few months later.
 
When she opened one of the bags, £99 I think, the front wall bent forward and she stuffed, yes stuffed, the shoulder strap in it but didn’t close the fastener. I like to see how easy/fiddly they are.
 
Well it is a range that is popular on QVC.Most of the pieces are not to my taste but looking at what is on offer as a fashion range within the clothing market as a whole I still cannot see the attraction.I can only think that Ruth in her position as a presenter on main stream TV appeals to some people who perceive her as a trusty friend who is on their wavelength?
Better is available on the High St. with more style, quality and a lot cheaper.My opinion only! And why would they care as long as the money rolls in?
Read that she made 2 million last year from QVC
 
Read that she made 2 million last year from QVC
Everyone has the right to spend their money as they wish & we do have different taste.However I was in the industry for many years and have a detached view , it is not what I personally would wear, but what the market I was working for would like & that was respected.So that is how I view this range, it is OK but not groundbreaking and overpriced.There are also (from the reviews) sizing issues which they need to sort out.There are some nice pieces but I wouldn’t take the chance with the P&p / return costs
 
Read that she made 2 million last year from QVC
Hell of a contract she signed then ! Must be the easiest money she's ever made - a few meetings where others make the decisions and a few hours every few weeks stroking clothes on a hanger and waxing lyrical about them
 
I loved how she tried to convince us that if you buy a cheap stripy t shirt the stripes won't match up front and back, hers do of course, and that's why you have to pay a little bit lot more for them - What a loada cobblers Ruth!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top