- Joined
- Aug 8, 2023
- Messages
- 1,462
What's Sally doing on? Trying to give me nightmares?
Who else is he? It's my own fault for not being on here much these days I know, but I am intriguedWhy are you a completely different person when you use your other sign-on?
It's not the first time something like this has happened. Unfortunately, I don't think that it will be the last.Turn around is fair play in my world. This dyslexic has a long memory and will never forget you ripping my spelling and grammar to shreds. No one else on this forum has ever nitpicked either my spelling or my grammar
Maybe you should think twice about what you post and how it might come back to haunt you.
Desperate for another free holiday no doubt. Presume that's the only reason she resorts to this sales tactic when none of the others, not even Dirty Peter, do.Sally isn’t really suited to the late shift, you normally find that shift non hard sell, but you had her Hard Sell, and help me feed the children.
Yes she is the only one who mentions itDesperate for another free holiday no doubt. Presume that's the only reason she resorts to this sales tactic when none of the others, not even Dirty Peter, do.
I find it interesting that he/she/they can make offensive comments about people's spelling and grammar, but when someone on here told them to "kept taking the tablets" they accused them of being down on people who take medication!Turn around is fair play in my world. This dyslexic has a long memory and will never forget you ripping my spelling and grammar to shreds. No one else on this forum has ever nitpicked either my spelling or my grammar
Maybe you should think twice about what you post and how it might come back to haunt you.
It's not me, I find it hard enough being Muttley and my real identityWho else is he? It's my own fault for not being on here much these days I know, but I am intrigued
I am not sure it is a 'he'. Best not to as it more an instinct thing. You would need to see the site's web activity reports to be sure. Even then, an experienced (I was going to say a 'decent' troll) multi-IDer has ways around being spotted. Maybe they'll name themselves at some point. It is interesting, though, it has never been challenged or denied. The first thing most wrongly accused of two sign-ons would do is vehemently deny it.Who else is he? It's my own fault for not being on here much these days I know, but I am intrigued
Many many years ago when I was a member of a big brother forum that was rife with trolls a small group of us joined another big brother forum we could go to when the troll activity got too much. My mind was a total blank trying to think of a different name for the new forum so in the end I registered as whoamiIt's not me, I find it hard enough being Muttley and my real identity
Unfortunately for me as I’m from the generation they pick most of the names from I hear my real name a lot as having bought or commented on whatever tat they are sellingAs I found out give your real name out in one of these threads, you get texts sent in as you,
This is where, from a business perspective (not poking fun) I would genuinely be interested to know how well, or not, the current model is working for them. As has been touched on previously, perhaps the pile 'em high and sell 'em cheap approach is working for them? Smaller margins but higher quantities sold. And on some items e.g. the air fryers, perhaps the margins aren't too bad. If other retailers are selling a 5l digital model for £40 and IW is charging £70 for something near identical, and shifting a few, then in that sense who can blame them. I'd love to know how much product they actually shift.£7.99 umbrellas with Yannis Markopoulos. With the sort of patterns a 1970s’ Tokyo ‘good-time girl’ would stand under on a street corner looking for a Toyota Crown to pull up and then off. The goods are just so relentlessly uninspiring and downmarket. I cannot imagine the actual demographic who would part with money for.
Yeah, the fact that they use forum members' names as "buyers" or "texters" is a clear sign that someone is reading and keeping an eye on this forum. There have been other things, usually involving Peter Simon, that we've talked about on here and then will get addressed on his next shift (the botched cosmetic procedure, claiming "pricing errors" and you'll never see it at that price again).It is clearly read. Despite any denials by them, it is an entertaining, sparky and funny sub-forum. Very different to the QVC one here, say, which tends to be more ‘normal’ and routine.
I can see people buying cheapo goods (not much to lose) but not the overpriced stuff such as "designer" watches and the opatra range. Nutty Natalia must shift some stock or she wouldn't be sitting there day after day. That is baffling.This is where, from a business perspective (not poking fun) I would genuinely be interested to know how well, or not, the current model is working for them. As has been touched on previously, perhaps the pile 'em high and sell 'em cheap approach is working for them? Smaller margins but higher quantities sold. And on some items e.g. the air fryers, perhaps the margins aren't too bad. If other retailers are selling a 5l digital model for £40 and IW is charging £70 for something near identical, and shifting a few, then in that sense who can blame them. I'd love to know how much product they actually shift.
Surely we have to assume that's the case, otherwise why persevere with that model?