Is it my TV or does Peter S look like a bag of.
It just says a lot for the standards at Ideal World, that they let presenters on screen in some awful states. Now and again when you see one of the crew members etc, even they all look scruffy.
Is it my TV or does Peter S look like a bag of.
£1099.99 for a Swan and Edgar tourbillion......
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/330...668#3468#15607#45&&pdp_ext_f={"scene":"3339"}
The swan and Edgar trademark was registered by James fields in 2017 and gamages in 2018 so no connection between the old brands and the present companies other than they trademarked the names. And as for the watch company in my opinion all fields family are just drop shippers of cheap Chinese made watches, ideal world and tjc must know this but are making profit.If that S&E wallet is worth £70, I’m the Queen of Sheba.
Why are they allowed to promote a long-standing connection between the watch brand and the former store? What actually is the connection, other than they both share the same name?
I wonder where are the five generations of the Fields family watchmakers Bullsh1t PS keeps going on aboutThe swan and Edgar trademark was registered by James fields in 2017 and gamages in 2018 so no connection between the old brands and the present companies other than they trademarked the names. And as for the watch company in my opinion all fields family are just drop shippers of cheap Chinese made watches, ideal world and tjc must know this but are making profit.
It really does show who IW's target market is when it comes to watches. Paul B was selling whatever brand a couple of nights back. The watch had an RRP of £900 and they were selling it for something like £229.99.
'And when you're telling your mates about this watch, or when they ask you about it, you can say it's a £900 watch, because it is, it has an RRP of £900. You don't need to tell them you only paid £229.99 for it, do you'
If that S&E wallet is worth £70, I’m the Queen of Sheba.
Why are they allowed to promote a long-standing connection between the watch brand and the former store? What actually is the connection, other than they both share the same name?
Only registered swan and Edgar and gamages trademarks in the last 4 years, baby fields runs both companies as I believe daddy fields had financial problems.There is no connection. And they do it cause they know ASA won't do a damn thing apart from a wee slap on the wrist.
This evening he said that Swan and Edgar 'transformed' into this 'beautiful' 'boutique' watch brand in 'London'. The words 'transformed', 'beautiful', 'boutique' and 'London' doing some serious heavy lifting thereThe swan and Edgar trademark was registered by James fields in 2017 and gamages in 2018 so no connection between the old brands and the present companies other than they trademarked the names. And as for the watch company in my opinion all fields family are just drop shippers of cheap Chinese made watches, ideal world and tjc must know this but are making profit.
I wonder where are the five generations of the Fields family watchmakers Bullsh1t PS keeps going on about![]()
This evening he said that Swan and Edgar 'transformed' into this 'beautiful' 'boutique' watch brand in 'London'. The words 'transformed', 'beautiful', 'boutique' and 'London' doing some serious heavy lifting there
Also Shaun earlier had the cheek to refer to "ITV viewers who have just joined us", perhaps implying those viewers were perhaps dumb enough to be taken in by this Swan and Edgar rubbish. If you want to hear for yourself it's at 37:55 in this video.
Only registered swan and Edgar and gamages trademarks in the last 4 years, baby fields runs both companies as I believe daddy fields had financial problems.
https://www.accountancydaily.co/property-developer-director-banned-£500k-tax-dodge