During yesterday's 8pm watch show, ol' Shaun "Nan Nanty-Nan" Ryan claimed that collectors were "on the phones", and this got me wondering if he could legally make such a claim without substantiated evidence. Or has it been proven that statements like that are permissible?
Nanty is quite happy to lie through his teeth with the best of them -for example claiming that the so called 'Thomas Earnshaw' is a heritage brand when the name was registered just a few years ago and has zero connection with the historic horologist and his long defunct company.
Even Mike Mason cannot bring himself to retail the fake connection and describes the current brand as a 'nod' to Earnshaw but Nanty has no such qualms.