I work for Waitrose and our company has been accused of racism because they marketed a trio of chocolate ducks. Milk, white, dark. under each duck on the packaging, is a name. Milk choc is called "crispy" which would make sense if it had crispy bits in - it didn't, but I guess a pun on "crispy duck" the white one which was a yellowish colour was named "fluffy" - stands to reason, and the dark chocolate one which was laced had pink splodges was labelled "ugly" - representing the ugly duckling from the well known fairy tale. I'm not quite sure why they did this, as a trio of chocolate ducks didn't really require names, I'm guessing they just wanted to add a bit of humour/interest to the product.
The product was withdrawn and a full apology made to those who were offended and an assurance that no aspersion to race was intended. It has since been repackaged but without the names. Jeez though! My first thought was isn't it slightly racist to equate the colour of someone's skin with a piece of chocolate, not only that, the product represents a duck, not a human being!! Yes, if it was a trio of chocolate people, and the dark one was called "Ugly" and the other two were labelled with favourable names, yes, I think it would be totally understandable - but where is this PC craziness gonna stop?!
The product was withdrawn and a full apology made to those who were offended and an assurance that no aspersion to race was intended. It has since been repackaged but without the names. Jeez though! My first thought was isn't it slightly racist to equate the colour of someone's skin with a piece of chocolate, not only that, the product represents a duck, not a human being!! Yes, if it was a trio of chocolate people, and the dark one was called "Ugly" and the other two were labelled with favourable names, yes, I think it would be totally understandable - but where is this PC craziness gonna stop?!