- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 6,346
Remind me of my Grandad's long-johns. I remember him when we were kids and I'm 61 now. It's got to be one of the worst looks.
I expected more from a uk fashion brand. I agree about the white leggings, they look rather odd... they are all frumpy looking and definitely don't fit right.
The only thing worse is germoline pink which makes it look as if you are out in bare untanned legs.
Back in the 80s my friend went to a fancy dress party as Lady Godiva thanks to a cheap pink T-shirt and leggings combo from South Shore market in Blackpool and a home made fig leaf. She had many double-takes* on the pre-party pub crawl! :mysmilie_3:
:muscle:
(*still not the most disturbing sight on a Blackpool night out!)
Why do leggings always seem to be worn by those who should not be within a million miles of them? (probably 99% of the population)
I remember seeing a woman in really thin white leggings but the thing is, she had black knickers on so from the front.......from the front.....no I can't say it, but you know what I mean. :mysmilie_17:
I never 'get' the look with the second skin leggings or the tight trousers. OK for the youngsters, but on middle aged women, er no. and I've said this dozens of times, where I live I never see anyone in high or killer heels with leggings, tbh it looks cheap. They prattle on about something being 'very Audrey Hepburn', but she was never seen in anything other than flatties with cigarette pants. Q stylists wouldn't know what chic, elegance, or classy was if it bit them on the bum.
I notice too that long sleeves are always pushed up to the elbow - I learnt my lesson long ago with long sleeves, most come way down past my hand, and I've got an average arm length !
Oh my gawd, shopperholic, I've had to have a lie down in a darkened room, I would need therapy to recover after seeing a sight like that! :mysmilie_13::mysmilie_507: