****ies

[Sazza]

How can they expect the presenters to dress appropriately when Sarah B herself is on air wearing something rather revealing.

 

[Graham]

As for her Close Out Deal, how long can it take, just get to the final price. Heart Beats should not be needed to sell if as she says they are so good.

Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk

 

[MissMagpie]

How can they expect the presenters to dress appropriately when Sarah B herself is on air wearing something rather revealing.

It was not TOO bad - strapless, but not very low cut and not tight.

What puzzles me, though, is why the female presenters can't wear NORMAL elegant/smart clothes, and have to look like they're dressed up for a night out. (Take a look at Vicky Gordon on Rocks & Co right now; that's the standard to aspire to!)

 

[Meeshoo]

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know the following:-

- standing up looking into a mirror may show less ****age
- sitting down and leaning forward will show more
- cameras are angled down towards gems so of course will be angled towards ****age

It's not difficult to buy clothes that don't look like you're a star in a soft porn movie. Some of the sexiest dresses are ones that are actually quite high with slashed neckline. It's not impossible to find classy clothes - but much easier to find trashy ones.

I'd rather see a pretty necklace over a dress/top than ****s.

Please ladies, sort it out.

 

[PJ.]

I see Ali is showing cleavage again ......


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Sacha]

Just tuning in to see Ali has morphed into little Jim Brooman. :happy: I am pleased to see him on GemsTV.

I'm not keen on the ladies displaying their assets and though we have complained for years......they still keep doing it!
But its also annoying me so much that they are still playing that godawful overly loud stoopid muzak and sound effects. What's so flaming hard about playing something pleasant, calming and quiet?? And ditch that irritating heartbeat noise. Rant over! :doh:

 

[J.T]

Hi

I hope you are all well. I am new to the forum (though have been reading it for a while) and have been watching rocks.tv/gems.tv for even longer. Thought I would post my 2 cents on this issue.

I can understand why people might be offended by a presenter showing too much of their own 'gems' and not showcasing the jewellery properly. I completely understand why this is an issue. Personally I enjoy watching Gems.TV, especially when the jewellery is the focus of the attention as I find the programmes incredibly informative and though sometimes some presenters may tread on the wrong side of the (neck) line the shows in general more than make up for this. Nevertheless I recognise that for others it may be too much of a distraction. I don't understand why people keep watching though if this is such an issue. From my reading some people have an entirely negative view of Gems.TV which they are absolutely entitled to (please don't misunderstand me and think I am saying they shouldn't voice their opinion). I just don't know why they force themselves to watch a channel they dislike so much. Particularly when there are so many other channels to watch.

Not a criticism, just a curiosity.

 

[PJ.]

See Ali has a top which is way too low showing way to much cleavage on now. Steve didn't you say you were sorting this? If I want to see that I will go on a 900 channel.

PJ


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk