yorkrose26
Registered Shopper
Hello,
Or should that be has Q lost the plot part '2 million'!
I know I stated in a previous posting that I would 'simmer down' and boy was it hard after Carla and yesterday's TSV, and her '1000 and 1 ways' of describing her 'girls', 'puppies', 'boys' take your pick (the TSV was shapewear so I think one can safely (and correctly assume where I am going with that, but as this is a 'family forum' I will leave that there)),
No this posting is with regards to today's TSV, have Q really really lost the plot (I mean more so than normal (if that is indeed possible (yep the brackets are back)), I mean the TSV today is available on another Shopping Channel and not only that Charlie mentions (several times) the other shopping channel, surely that is like mentioning the competition? I mean they will be selling things from IW next and stating what a 'massive' price reduction they have. I am not sure whether it is me and I know others stated before on this forum that they think Q is struggling and this only 'waters those seeds of doubt'!
One wonders whether Q has a stake-holders share in 'High Street TV' thus are allowed to mention it by name rather than the ambiguous 'look elsewhere' which is usually the statement, for being able to find the same product cheaper in the mythical 'elsewhere'!
Or should that be has Q lost the plot part '2 million'!
I know I stated in a previous posting that I would 'simmer down' and boy was it hard after Carla and yesterday's TSV, and her '1000 and 1 ways' of describing her 'girls', 'puppies', 'boys' take your pick (the TSV was shapewear so I think one can safely (and correctly assume where I am going with that, but as this is a 'family forum' I will leave that there)),
No this posting is with regards to today's TSV, have Q really really lost the plot (I mean more so than normal (if that is indeed possible (yep the brackets are back)), I mean the TSV today is available on another Shopping Channel and not only that Charlie mentions (several times) the other shopping channel, surely that is like mentioning the competition? I mean they will be selling things from IW next and stating what a 'massive' price reduction they have. I am not sure whether it is me and I know others stated before on this forum that they think Q is struggling and this only 'waters those seeds of doubt'!
One wonders whether Q has a stake-holders share in 'High Street TV' thus are allowed to mention it by name rather than the ambiguous 'look elsewhere' which is usually the statement, for being able to find the same product cheaper in the mythical 'elsewhere'!