Ms Twee Voice is on with Jill Franks (who looks as though she's stepped into a Primark mesh shopping basket) touting a clackety-clack-clack clack semi-demi precious pebbly necklace. (Let's hope Alexis doesn't buy one or we'll have that clacking against the mixing bowl when she lathers her soaps. Nikki just said her necklace is named after her son, Fred, who is independent, individual, strong "like us women, actually."
So, Nikki, are you implying men are all dependent, homogenous clones and weak?
She does seem to trot out these feminist lines quite regularly. On her promo / advert she says "Lola Rose is all about celebrating women and their individuality....blah blah blah."
Please do not misunderstand me, I'm not having a pop at women and I am certainly not saying they shouldn't be happy / proud / creative / whatever they want to be, I'm just not sure why Nikki feels it necessary to make the statements and distinctions she does. Of course women are individual / creative etc etc - as are men and transgender people and probably any other type of person one would care to think about.
I would argue that Lola Rose has very little to do with "celebrating women" and is more about her making a shed load of money from a few tumbled beads on a string.
I understand she is on the telly to peddle her beady wares but why is she also trying to push her feminist agenda? Julie flaaaaaaaaaahs doesn't bang on about women all the time, does she?
How would women feel if a guest were to come on with a men's product and claim how "it empowers men" and that "men are individual and unique....?" They'd just be stating the flipping obvious - much as Nikki does about women.
So, Nikki, are you implying men are all dependent, homogenous clones and weak?
She does seem to trot out these feminist lines quite regularly. On her promo / advert she says "Lola Rose is all about celebrating women and their individuality....blah blah blah."
Please do not misunderstand me, I'm not having a pop at women and I am certainly not saying they shouldn't be happy / proud / creative / whatever they want to be, I'm just not sure why Nikki feels it necessary to make the statements and distinctions she does. Of course women are individual / creative etc etc - as are men and transgender people and probably any other type of person one would care to think about.
I would argue that Lola Rose has very little to do with "celebrating women" and is more about her making a shed load of money from a few tumbled beads on a string.
I understand she is on the telly to peddle her beady wares but why is she also trying to push her feminist agenda? Julie flaaaaaaaaaahs doesn't bang on about women all the time, does she?
How would women feel if a guest were to come on with a men's product and claim how "it empowers men" and that "men are individual and unique....?" They'd just be stating the flipping obvious - much as Nikki does about women.