historymystery
Registered Shopper
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2015
- Messages
- 3,857
Tuned in to watch a bit of this just after 11 am this morning. On a positive note, the female guest actually said about one of the rings: "we recommend you go up one or two sizes, because of the design" (it was a barrel-shaped ring). At least she was telling us something relevant, instead of just a succession of the oohs and aahs about how "wonderful" it is, how "on trend" it is, or that it's worn by Kim Cardashforbus. But: Craig talks about a pair of earrings and then says "you just pay £8-50 plus postage". Er, no, Craig, you don't - you pay over twenty quid plus postage, because £8.50 is the easy-pay price. And considering these items are eek, although set in silver, should he comment that the cabochon cut gives colour to the "gem"? And is a fake stone a "gem" anyway? I think they need to be much more careful when selling fake stones: even though they may be set in silver, the stones are not gemstones, and I don't think they should be giving that impression by using the word "gem", nor should the easy pay price be mentioned without clarifying that it is the initial easy-pay payment only. Shades of IW?
Last edited: