Fraggle
Registered Shopper
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 235
Wouldnt be like you Tootsie, would it?
Comments like that are why debates turn into arguments.
Please let's not make this personal between people.
Wouldnt be like you Tootsie, would it?
I'm really not wanting to get into a silly argument here but are you really saying if it came to a decision between saving a human's life and an animal's life you'd put them both on equal footing?
I'm really not wanting to get into a silly argument here but are you really saying if it came to a decision between saving a human's life and an animal's life you'd put them both on equal footing?
That's an interesting question. Which human, which animal? If it were a choice between saving my bunny or Gary Glitter - no contest.
If they were both strangers to me, I'd save the human. Why? Because the loss of the human would be likely to create the most hurt - they are likely to be connected to more people, probably had more influence on the world. But that doesn't mean that the animal's life is worth nothing.
I don't see human life as more "important" than animal life. I am uncomfortable with a ranking system based on perceived value. Are disabled people of less importance than able-bodied people because of their more limited potential? The conclusion of a system like that ends up in the gas chambers.
I would argue about disabled people having a more limited potential, Steven Hawking being a fantastic case in point but that is veering from the point :1:...
I find this whole subject fascinating, and I wonder just how much of is culturally dictated (98% at a guess) We know longer farm our own animals, no longer rely on meat for sustenance and have the option of being vegetarian. Hunting no longer has the status that is once had, while the women gathered in the grain and kept everyone going through lean times and yet the celebration was reserved for the spoils of the hunt. We are now squeamish about the details of the preparation of our food, we buy our chickens plucked and free from giblets, our meat filleted and processed, and are removed from the steps between the animals in pasture and the meat in the packaging. The like to think we are a nation of animal lovers, and that our animals are treated wit dignity and respect.
I don't wear fur, but only because I think it looks better on the animal itself. I do wear leather. I do eat meat. If I saw a fur item I liked I probably wouldn't buy it, but only because as a student I'm surrounded by militant vegetarians and vegans and probably wouldn't be brave enough :1: However in years to come I might change my mind. I am not outraged by fur, I don't think fur farms are any worse than cattle farms, and certainly no worse than Bernard Matthews Turkey farms - remember the baseball tapes?
I would argue about disabled people having a more limited potential, Steven Hawking being a fantastic case in point but that is veering from the point :1:...
I find this whole subject fascinating, and I wonder just how much of is culturally dictated (98% at a guess) We know longer farm our own animals, no longer rely on meat for sustenance and have the option of being vegetarian. Hunting no longer has the status that is once had, while the women gathered in the grain and kept everyone going through lean times and yet the celebration was reserved for the spoils of the hunt. We are now squeamish about the details of the preparation of our food, we buy our chickens plucked and free from giblets, our meat filleted and processed, and are removed from the steps between the animals in pasture and the meat in the packaging. The like to think we are a nation of animal lovers, and that our animals are treated wit dignity and respect.
I don't wear fur, but only because I think it looks better on the animal itself. I do wear leather. I do eat meat. If I saw a fur item I liked I probably wouldn't buy it, but only because as a student I'm surrounded by militant vegetarians and vegans and probably wouldn't be brave enough :1: However in years to come I might change my mind. I am not outraged by fur, I don't think fur farms are any worse than cattle farms, and certainly no worse than Bernard Matthews Turkey farms - remember the baseball tapes?
I understand that some people believe human life is more important than animal life but I don't agree.
My darling house rabbit has many different moods, he expresses excitement, curiosity, affection, fear, boredom, naughtiness. First thing in the morning he races round the house leaping into the air out of sheer joy at being a bun. He knows when I'm upset and tries to comfort me, he loves to play games and we have competitions together (who can wriggle out from under the rug first - he always wins). He understands a lot of what I say ("litter tray, please, Hendrix") and we communicate in lots of other ways too. When he wants fresh food he will lead me to his bowl and look into it pointedly. Sometimes he behaves like a sulky teenager flicking his back legs up at me in disgust at my actions ("I'm only going into my hutch because I WANT to, not because you SAID so"). He loves being massaged and you can see the look of purest pleasure on his face while Daddy gives him a good ear rub.
There's no way I could dismiss animals as "dumb" or with anything less of a self than I have. Surely the mark of a civilised society is how it treats its most vulnerable - it's our duty to love and respect the animals we share this earth with.
Here endeth my lesson. :1:
What a fantastic post you have said what I could never put into words so eloquently. I totally agree with you on this subject.I would argue about disabled people having a more limited potential, Steven Hawking being a fantastic case in point but that is veering from the point :1:...
I find this whole subject fascinating, and I wonder just how much of is culturally dictated (98% at a guess) We know longer farm our own animals, no longer rely on meat for sustenance and have the option of being vegetarian. Hunting no longer has the status that is once had, while the women gathered in the grain and kept everyone going through lean times and yet the celebration was reserved for the spoils of the hunt. We are now squeamish about the details of the preparation of our food, we buy our chickens plucked and free from giblets, our meat filleted and processed, and are removed from the steps between the animals in pasture and the meat in the packaging. The like to think we are a nation of animal lovers, and that our animals are treated wit dignity and respect.
I don't wear fur, but only because I think it looks better on the animal itself. I do wear leather. I do eat meat. If I saw a fur item I liked I probably wouldn't buy it, but only because as a student I'm surrounded by militant vegetarians and vegans and probably wouldn't be brave enough :1: However in years to come I might change my mind. I am not outraged by fur, I don't think fur farms are any worse than cattle farms, and certainly no worse than Bernard Matthews Turkey farms - remember the baseball tapes?
Hi,
one thing we all seem to agree on is that Mr basso is a disgusting man.
Cheers,
Karen
However, when every human on the planet has access to medical care and education, adequate nutrition, safe drinking water and shelter, then I'll speak for the animal kingdom
the more time i am with qvc the more i think they only REALLY rate new customers - retaining customers is great, but new customers is where the big money is
The problem is that by buying into the Basso brand whather you're buying fake or real fur you're condoning what he does and giving him the revenue to carry on doing it
If all the "dumb" animals were to disappear, the world's eco-system would collapse in short order.. if humans went, only caged animals would see any problem. Animals are much more important.
I did not call animals 'dumb' and although I know very little about eco-systems, I realise the importance of all the various systems on Earth.
However, my point didn't concern eco-systems, it was about the welfare of humans, and that is a more important matter than animal well-being. Our first duty is to care for our fellow humans.
Actually that's just your opinion.
That kind of attitude reminds me of people who won't give to charities helping people in different countries, because "If it's not on my doorstep I don't care".
Animals can't speak for themselves so they have to be protected. Why should they be born simply to provide us with clothes and food? Why should they be tortured simply to make our stomachs full for a few hours or make a handbag.
Yes a lot of humans can't look after themselves, and we should help them. Thing is, we can help them and animals at the same time. It's not a 'one or the other' type situation.