Tinkerbelle
Registered Shopper
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 3,755
I won't bore you with all the details but having had a claim refused I have taken it to the Financial Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has upheld my complaint. They should have paid out. BUT Petplan have now said that they would have refused the claim for a different reason so the Ombudsman says that's that.
How the hell is that right? I've fought a claim that was refused for one reason. The Ombudsman says they should not have refused on that basis so they get to bring in a substitute reason.
That reason doesn't hold water either as they're now saying the cat didn't have a dental check in the 12 months preceding the initial diagnosis. Well he did because he was diagnosed in 2009 and not 2010 as they're saying but now I've only got 10 days to argue my case.
The original claim was refused because the vet wrote rubbish notes that Petplan chose to interpret to be able to refuse the claim. The vet didn't support me wholeheartedly but I kicked her arse and got the practice to pay me the £900 bill in full because of the part in the whole debacle.
Petplan are a miserable bunch of gits and the Ombudsman service is clearly not quite the unbiased adjudicator I thought. I'm not allowed to change my sodding argument but Petplan can. Grrr!!
How the hell is that right? I've fought a claim that was refused for one reason. The Ombudsman says they should not have refused on that basis so they get to bring in a substitute reason.
That reason doesn't hold water either as they're now saying the cat didn't have a dental check in the 12 months preceding the initial diagnosis. Well he did because he was diagnosed in 2009 and not 2010 as they're saying but now I've only got 10 days to argue my case.
The original claim was refused because the vet wrote rubbish notes that Petplan chose to interpret to be able to refuse the claim. The vet didn't support me wholeheartedly but I kicked her arse and got the practice to pay me the £900 bill in full because of the part in the whole debacle.
Petplan are a miserable bunch of gits and the Ombudsman service is clearly not quite the unbiased adjudicator I thought. I'm not allowed to change my sodding argument but Petplan can. Grrr!!