Diamonique TSV 1/7/24

There is a Diamonique TSV on 1st July

Steel by Diamonique 3 Piece Bangle & Bracelet Set Stainless Steel
Item Number 351098
QVC Price £66.00
TSV Price £32.97
P&P £3.95

Layer your jewellery look with this three-piece stainless steel bracelet set from the Steel by Diamonique collection. You'll receive an orb bracelet, a tennis bangle, and a link bracelet, all sparkling with Diamonique simulated diamonds and supplied in a gorgeous Diamonique gift box and pouch - perfect as a gift or as a versatile addition to your own jewellery collection. This beautifully coordinated trio will look amazing worn together or can be split up to create a range of sparkling looks.

The six Cs of Diamonique - this beautiful design features the six Cs of Diamonique - unbeatable Clarity, great Carat weight, believable clear Colour, to give the look of diamonds at a fraction of the Cost, beautifully Cut stones, and a piece that exudes Confidence. The clarity of each stone ensures optimum sparkle as the light can travel through perfectly.

The beauty of stainless steel - this hard-wearing material is naturally fade and tarnish resistant offering you fantastic style for less. These sets are available in three classic metal tone finishes - Gold Tone, Rose Gold Tone and Silver Tone - providing a high fashion look for a fraction of the price.

Options for all wrists - this trio is available in three sizes with the bracelet length and bangle inner circumference ranging from approximately 17cm - 21cm (6.7" - 8.3"), to accommodate a wide range of wrist sizes.

Ready to give - whether you want to split them out into three separate presents or share the full trio with a loved one, this set is supplied with a gift box and pouch ready and waiting to show them how much you care!

Stainless steel
Lobster claw clasp bracelet fastening
Hinged clasp on the bangle

Stones:
Orb bracelet (all sizes):
Round, brilliant-cut, flush set white simulated diamond: 1 x (2.5mm)
Total equivalent diamond weight: 0.05 carat
Bangle (Small):
Round, brilliant-cut white simulated diamonds in a channel-look setting: 25 x (3mm)
Total equivalent diamond weight: 2.5 carats
Bangle (Medium):
Round, brilliant-cut white simulated diamonds in a channel-look setting: 28 x (3mm)
Total equivalent diamond weight: 2.8 carats
Bangle (Large):
Round, brilliant-cut white simulated diamonds in a channel-look setting: 30 x (3mm)
Total equivalent diamond weight: 3 carats
Chain link bracelet (all sizes):
Round, brilliant-cut, bezel-set white simulated diamond: 1 x (4mm)
Total equivalent diamond weight: 0.25 carat

Colour options:
Gold tone
Rose gold tone
Silver tone

Size options:
Small
Medium
Large

Contains:
1 x Steel By Diamonique tennis bangle
1 x Steel By Diamonique orb bracelet
1 x Steel By Diamonique link bracelet
1 x gift box and pouch

Measurements:

Small:
Orb bracelet length: 17cm + 3cm (6.7" + 1.2") extender chain.
Bangle inner circumference: 17.5cm.
Chain link bracelet 17cm + 3cm (6.7" + 1.2") extender chain

Medium:
Orb bracelet length: 19cm + 3cm (7.5" + 1.2") extender chain
Bangle inner circumference: 19cm (7.3")
Chain link bracelet length: 19cm + 3cm (7.5" + 1.2") extender chain

Large:
Orb bracelet length: 21cm + 3cm (8.3" + 1.2") extender chain
Bangle inner circumference: 20.5cm (8.1")
Chain link bracelet length: 21cm + 3cm (8.3" + 1.2") extender chain
Metal balls diameter: 7mm and 4mm
Cast metal disc on extender chain diameter: 9mm

Ooh, looking forward to seeing the pics.
Nice that those of us with hands like shovels may be able to have a bangle that we can actually get on….

Fingers crossed smarmy Lee isn’t the BA. Just switched on Style and he’s on for to two hours with Pippa. Two seconds on my TV and switched channels.

Turned on to watch, saw who was presenting and BA (Jill Franks and Smarmy Lee) . Rapidly changed channels. I’d set it to record at midnight but I’ve now cancelled it.
Don’t usually like their stainless steel offerings but as these come in larger sizes, I could have been tempted but not with him.

Battiola73 said:

Turned on to watch, saw who was presenting and BA (Jill Franks and Smarmy Lee) . Rapidly changed channels. I’d set it to record at midnight but I’ve now cancelled it.
Don’t usually like their stainless steel offerings but as these come in larger sizes, I could have been tempted but not with him.

Click to expand...

I've never seen him before, I thought he was a new presenter, he certainly acts like one, very familiar.

Battiola73 said:

Turned on to watch, saw who was presenting and BA (Jill Franks and Smarmy Lee) . Rapidly changed channels. I’d set it to record at midnight but I’ve now cancelled it.
Don’t usually like their stainless steel offerings but as these come in larger sizes, I could have been tempted but not with him.

Click to expand...

Saves me money when she is on swiftly switch off.

He used to be a presenter on QVC. I think he’s been a presenter on most of the shopping channels at one time or another. Don’t mind Jill too much but I put him in the same box as Mr Insincerity Biagi and Mrs Insincerity Eyelid Naanbread.

Platinum to gold to silver to stainless Steel... what next ? to copper to brass to... plastic then plasticine ?
Nope, for me stainless steel smacks of cheapness because they can't afford to use silver

I had a look online at them. They’re a good price but they still remind me of old fashioned toilet chains or chain dog leads the Barbara Woodhouse used to recommend.

Battiola73 said:

Turned on to watch, saw who was presenting and BA (Jill Franks and Smarmy Lee) . Rapidly changed channels. I’d set it to record at midnight but I’ve now cancelled it.
Don’t usually like their stainless steel offerings but as these come in larger sizes, I could have been tempted but not with him.

Click to expand...

Me too, can't abide Jill for more then a couple of seconds and he just tops it off. So I would probably have been tempted, as I often am if I actually watch the show, but now I can resist quite easily just looking at the items online. I caught the end of the hour this morning and it sounds like one or other of them are on all day. That'll be me not trying to catch up with it then.

Brissles said:

Platinum to gold to silver to stainless Steel... what next ? to copper to brass to... plastic then plasticine ?
Nope, for me stainless steel smacks of cheapness because they can't afford to use silver

Click to expand...

Exactly.

Diamonique loses its ‘clout’ when demoted to just fashion jewellery.

I have some silver and 14 ct gold rings years old still look good, and I wear them.

Brissles said:

Platinum to gold to silver to stainless Steel... what next ? to copper to brass to... plastic then plasticine ?
Nope, for me stainless steel smacks of cheapness because they can't afford to use silver

Click to expand...

I agree but in this instance I think the whole set looks cheap possibly the bangle alone would look ok but the other two bits look like something you'd find in a Christmas cracker or a jamboree bag! Definitely doesn't look £40's worth and if you were to pay full price it would amount to nearly £70 and I'm pretty sure you could get a proper nice item of jewellery for that amount. I'm staggered that people are flocking to pay so much for this bunch of tat!
I quite liked the look of the 30 year anniversary pieces with the lotus flower setting, proper sterling silver and good sized stones.

They did a similar set as TSV some time ago & I don’t know what possessed me but I ordered.It was promptly returned , they looked clumsy and I don’t like stainless steel, there was nothing remotely believable about them.

Clothescloth said:

Diamonique loses its ‘clout’ when demoted to just fashion jewellery.

Click to expand...

Spot on! Looking at some of Brenda Edward's monstrosities, they remind me of when Avon started doing Jewellery back in the 70's which mainly consisted of knuckle duster rings made from base metal, and other similarly clumsy looking pieces usually set with very obviously fake rhinestones. I'm not sure they've improved now, but it definitely isn't a look QVC should be aspiring to for their flagship range. They really need to stick to doing good/believable copies of fine jewellery and I'm not saying everything needs to be small, dainty or understated, but it does need not to look cheap and nasty! They also need to leave the "designing" to somebody who knows what they're doing, not throw it over to the Loose Women, as you'll end up with something as vulgar as they are!

I would imagine stainless steel is quite heavy when made into jewellery. I do like the look of the lotus flower design of the month for July and could be tempted. There’s another Diamonique show on Sunday so hopefully Smarmy Lee won’t be on.

merryone said:

I agree but in this instance I think the whole set looks cheap possibly the bangle alone would look ok but the other two bits look like something you'd find in a Christmas cracker or a jamboree bag! Definitely doesn't look £40's worth and if you were to pay full price it would amount to nearly £70 and I'm pretty sure you could get a proper nice item of jewellery for that amount. I'm staggered that people are flocking to pay so much for this bunch of tat!
I quite liked the look of the 30 year anniversary pieces with the lotus flower setting, proper sterling silver and good sized stones.

Click to expand...

I wonder if Alison O’Reilly isn’t on these days because of the large amount of stainless steel they offer. I hope she’s not poorly again