yorkrose26
Registered Shopper
Why is that when presenters present a phone, or tablet or even bedding that is of 'lesser value' (money wise), do they need to compare it to items of more expensive value and try and 'convince' people that they are getting the same features and (better) in some cases than the more expensive ones. Alison Cork is doing it with practically every item she flogs, Amanda Holden does it to an extent, but the reason for the posting today was the Nokia 'Big Deal' phone. This is a budget (I know it is over £100, but lets face it in the 'smartphone world' it is budget) smartphone, yet constantly they were comparing it with phones 3 or 4 times more expensive, are they thus not setting a 'rod for their own back'? I mean if you are not that 'tech savvy' (and lets face it (and no offence to anyone on who uses this site) most people who watch QVC aren't)), this is fair enough, but when they are then being told by sales presenters, that this phone can do all that a £800 phone can do (and more), isn't this bordering on 'miss-selling'?
Sorry for the rant, it is just that my mother was looking into purchasing a new smartphone (given that 'cash' is out of favour now) and she saw this and was 'almost' taken in by the hype, I gently manoeuvred her to another!
Sorry for the rant, it is just that my mother was looking into purchasing a new smartphone (given that 'cash' is out of favour now) and she saw this and was 'almost' taken in by the hype, I gently manoeuvred her to another!