G
Graham
Guest Shopper
Can we see your drawings Sarah ?
Can we see your drawings Sarah ?
loobi said:New to this and I have one question please - is there any responsibility placed on the site owner or moderators to demonstrate any impartiality.
loobi said:.......................or guided and motivated by the head of design who pulls the collection together - come on Graham be impartial.
I will go in search of your other challenging and probing questions then - on other channel threads - if this channel is anything to go by they will be many, varied, balanced and throughly worthwhile reading
My take on it is that if I buy, for example, a Stephen Webster piece, I expect it to be a Stephen Webster piece and not available anywhere else. A "designer" name implies exclusivity.
When RocksTV started, a number of "Sarah Bennett" designs were found elsewhere. RocksTV explanation (if I remember correctly) was that they had found certain items and were guaranteed the lion's share of the pieces made. So whilst the same pieces may be found elsewhere, the majority would be sold on RocksTV.
To brand these as Sarah Bennett designs are/was misleading. As a consumer, I'd be pretty peeved if I bought something believing it to be exclusive, only to find it elsewhere (albeit with slight differences).
If jewellery is marketed as a "designer" brand, you also expect the designs to be by that designer/design house - not bought in from a third party.
With due respect to Sarah most of her stuff sells about £30 - £60 so hardly "designer" in the commonly recognised description of exclusivity. Can't see a cat fight at the Oscars if two ladies find they are wearing an identical Rocks.TV design piece.
Great point, Mr Jones!
Arguing about designer jewels and shopping channels...ROFL.
I'm not arguing about anything. Personally I don't give a monkey's uncle but people bought those items believing them to be exclusive to RocksTV. They're not.