I don't understand what he got supposedly "got away with". As far as I am aware he never had any complaints upheld by the ASA. If he was guilty of a bit of scare mongering so was golden boy Andy Hodgson with the fire blanket as Benny mentioned in a previous post. I am no apologist for Mike but I am amazed by all the negativity on this forum regarding him. I can understand his loud, brash (pardon the pun) type demeanour and sales pitches is not everyone's cup of tea and maybe he has been sexist in the past. The other thing I don't understand is people say they miss the old Mike and he changed. But then they refer to his quiz call days as a stick to beat him with which was several years ago. So he was the same then as he is now.
People should just admit they don't like Mike but don't come on with all that rubbish that they used to like him and he changed.
