Pity the photo is so p**s poor (in the usual Q fashion).
they shouldn't use a white background imo
My eternal bugbear with pretty much all of their products... give them some context.
Jewellery is normally worn by people... can't they get some modelling shots done for the pieces?
I'd like to see the earrings in someone's ear, the necklaces around a neck, the watches and bracelets around a wrist, the brooches on the chest, and the rings on fingers... on a human being. By all means show us them without a human, but make sure they are properly displayed on a background that allows us to see and appreciate the differences in colour etc.
It's the same with shoes, and bags. How are we to judge what they look like in isolation. How does the shoe look like with a foot in it? How long is the strap on a bag? How does it sit against the body? Also they've dropped the shots of bags which show you the innards - zips and pockets etc.
With clothes, they need to tell us the height and dress size of the model - and what size(s) the model is wearing.
With the bedding - what is the earthly use of a pack shot????? What does the bedding look like on a bed.
The website needs more and better pictures. The videos are dreadful - they don't always run properly (I get greenscreen with voice and then swirling distortions - sometimes I can get them to run and give me a proper picture other times, no joy at all).
If it's too much bother to show us the goods for sale properly in
all mediums, why should we be bothered to buy?