Search results

But if it wasn't for an ASA complaint it would still be the minuscule writing it was, and it would sill not be vocalised. Infact if you look at IW their P&P charges are the same size.

Gems have £2.95 P&P ALL DAY so technically if you have bought something it would be under £30, while bids is £7.99 for each item which is far too high. In addition when bids was upheld, you couldnt even read their P&P charges as they were too small, and presenters (mike being the worst) saying...

The presenters are 'front line' and when making complaints we can hardly involve the bosses in them. When the complaints go through the main bosses see them which would not happen if we put a complaint through to bid CS. No excuse. Not enough time? Make the shifts shorter or more time to...

You get 3 liquid containers (3 pieces); 2 unattached nozzles (2 pieces); 2 cloths (2 pieces). Surely calling it 7 pieces is fair as the nozzles aren't attached to the bottles? If they called it a 10 piece set where they included the bottle caps, this would have been different. Bid could have...

Steve said yesterday whilst selling the camera "...If you have an expensive camera but don't want to take it on holiday, this is for you..." So he made it out that it wasn't an amazing camera, but I was also thinking that surely holidays is one of the main reasons why most people would buy a...

This is the product in question. As the spray isn't actually attached and is an 'extra'; and because it could be used without a spray Mike is in his right to call it a 7 piece kit.

As a presenter you have to expect stick from the public. Not necessarily rude, but criticism.

If you weren't rude about forum members, you may have had some respect.

Very attractive, Steve! ;)

I know not everybody likes lisa, but this is one reason why I do - she just doesn't care! aha!!

Not ONCE have I said to the ASA that I had bought the product which was being sold whilst misleading. I write what I see and that's it. In addition, when the ASA got back to me, they said that I could raise further concerns if I could show that I suffered from the misleading sales, which shoes...

I have NEVER applied to work for bid tv. Firstly if I did want to, I am too young to be a presenter, and for backstage I would go to Ideal World as it's closer to home, and better prospects than working at bid. Not to mention that I done work experience there and they have welcomed me back when...

Not sure where you are getting this information from, as I click "Are you complaining as a member of the public?" which doesn't say "You must have been effected by the sale".

No chance do they pay those prices http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/627507520/Block_out_ID_stamp.html this is more the place they will buy them

Tongue in cheek

I agree that they are being very truthful, but I assume it is just to be overcautious because OFCOM are on their backs. I would suspect that it is to show OFCOM how much they have 'changed'.

Bid have been so misleading in the past and the ASA complaints speak for this. I agree that they are being very overcautious, but with OFCOM watching they need to be. At the moment, if there are white lies I do think that they are mistakes and not intending to mislead and I would not put in a...

I was merely quoting the points where members had said about him going back to his old ways. Yes maybe staying away from sky/ virgin would be better, but the way you said it, it made it sound like he went back to his 10 minute spiel about sky etc. which was not the case. Yes he mentioned it, but...

What ones? I could find these ones... I saw this sell and this is where my comment about exaggerating came in. Yes mike did mention sky, but not how you may think he might have done from his past sells. He only said "I've reduced my sky package" (not even mentioning the cost) Peter then...

But I thought this tread was about how mike has changed for the better? So I was talking about what he said yesterday, not 6 months ago.